Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

A New Class of Nonvolcanic, Large, Peraluminous Copper-Oxide Greisen Deposits in Arizona, USA

Written By

Stanley B. Keith, Jan C. Rasmussen, Volker Spieth

Submitted: 22 November 2025 Reviewed: 27 November 2025 Published: 03 March 2026

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1014159

Latest Advances in Volcanology<br> IntechOpen
Latest Advances in Volcanology
Edited by Károly Németh

From the Edited Volume

Latest Advances in Volcanology [Working Title]

Dr. Károly Németh

Chapter metrics overview

1 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

An economically significant new type of large copper deposit is herein named the peraluminous copper-oxide deposit type (Gunnison type). These deposits can be economically significant, as the giant Gunnison system in southeastern Arizona contains three million tons of produced or drill-defined copper resources. The main ore mineral in these deposits is chrysocolla, with associated specular hematite. The paucity of sulfur results in only minor amounts of pyrite or copper sulfides. Other copper oxide minerals (in the context of leach processing) include minor malachite and azurite. Beryl (goshenite), fluorite, powellite, and hübnerite also occur. The latest Laramide emplacement ages of these copper-oxide greisen deposits at 68–43 Ma in Arizona are slightly younger than the more mafic, hornblende-bearing plutons associated with classic porphyry copper deposits emplaced between 78–53 Ma. Classic porphyry copper deposits formed in the upper crust (2–5 km deep) during the emplacement of mafic, metaluminous plutons during moderate-angle subduction. Porphyry-copper-related plutons acquired their copper from gabbroic melts developed by hydrous melting of layered mantle in the hanging wall of the flattening subducting Farallon plate. Peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits formed in midcrustal settings (10–15 km deep) and are associated with aluminum-rich, biotite granitoids formed by hydrous “water flooding” of the lower to midcrust during flat subduction in the latest Laramide. No volcanism is associated with these peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits. The peraluminous plutons acquired their copper from minimum melt, sialic, plutonic to metasedimentary sources in the lower to middle crust, under middle to upper amphibolite conditions.

Keywords

  • mineral resources
  • large copper deposits
  • peraluminous
  • greisen
  • chrysocolla
  • hematite
  • Gunnison Copper Project
  • Arizona
  • two-mica granite

1. Introduction

Large quantities of chrysocolla-bearing boulders were discovered over a large area at the Coronation prospect in La Paz County, Arizona, by Merrill Palmer in March 2017. This chrysocolla occurrence in albite-hematite-altered, peraluminous, biotite granodiorite (Figure 1 and 2) was anomalous to our understanding of the oxidation of conventional porphyry copper deposits. The co-existence of primary specular hematite with chrysocolla was particularly unusual and led to the speculation that the chrysocolla itself might be a primary ore mineral.

Figure 1.

Photographs and map of the discovery area at the undrilled Coronation, a copper-oxide prospect at 34°12’23” N, 113°38’12” W. The upper left picture shows the cliff face from which the hematitic- and chrysocolla-bearing boulder was derived. The lower left picture shows the 2 m (6’5”)-tall Stanley Keith for scale next to the chrysocolla boulder. The lower right photo shows pervasive chrysocolla on fractures and in the rock where it was broken open by a rock hammer. The upper right is a geologic map showing the outline of hematitic, chrysocolla-bearing, sodically altered granodiorite with the discovery boulders shown by red arrows. Blue arrows show down-dip projection of the inferred copper anomaly beneath the Plomosa Fault, which appears on the east and north parts of the map and in the schematic cross-section of Figure 2. Photos by Merrill Palmer on November 28, 2020.

Figure 2.

Schematic cross-section of Coronation Prospect, La Paz County in southwestern Arizona. Modified from [1].

The surface chrysocolla anomaly in Figure 1 is shown to the right of the Plomosa Fault label on the left side of the cross-section in Figure 2. The large surface area (4 km [2.5 miles]-long by 0.8 km [0.5 mile]-wide) of the copper-oxide anomalies at the Coronation prospect indicates the presence of a potentially large, peraluminous copper-oxide deposit. The deposit is currently undrilled, so the down-dip depth along the Plomosa Fault is unconfirmed. The cross-sectional exposure at the surface suggests a thickness of at least 152 m (500 ft). Approximately 30 grab samples from the south target area yielded an average grade of 0.59% Cu, and 40 samples from the north target area yielded an average grade of 0.67% Cu.

Recent analysis of copper occurrences in Pinal County in south-central Arizona led to the realization that a new magma-metal series model might be present. The epiphany began with the realization that the chrysocolla in the Little Hill mine might be hypogene in character [2, 3]. Additional research showed that the Little Hill deposit is one of numerous peraluminous copper-oxide deposits present throughout Pinal County and beyond [4, 5]. Furthermore, these copper-oxide greisen deposits are persistently associated with peraluminous granitoids and are examples of the new model, “peraluminous copper-oxide greisen” deposits, or the herein-named Gunnison-type deposit. Investigation of the abundant reports on the large Gunnison copper-oxide deposit in Cochise County, southeastern Arizona, strongly confirmed the model and proved that the peraluminous copper-oxide model is economically significant. Therefore, the Gunnison deposit could be considered the type deposit for the peraluminous copper-oxide greisen type of copper deposit.

2. Igneous rock association

Peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits are mainly restricted to lower plate terranes and their tectonic edges. Peraluminous granitoids are the main igneous rock in the lower plate windows beneath the Maricopa thrust, discussed below. The peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits are consistently associated with peraluminous granitoid plutonic suites.

Examples of large areas of peraluminous granitoids include the western Tortilla Mountains and the Estrella Mountains, where reduced age dates reflect uplift cooling during the Oligocene-Miocene-aged orogenic activity. Other examples of peraluminous granitoids occur in extensive areas of two-mica granites in the Ninetysix Hills, Grayback, and Black Mountain massifs in the Tortilla Mountains of southeastern Arizona. See maps below for mountain locations.

2.1 Peraluminous rock systems and petrochemistry

In the magma-metal series classification [6], peraluminous granitoids are classified as mostly peraluminous, calc-alkalic, hydrous, oxidized, normal halogen, magma-metal series. Peraluminous composition (aluminum-rich and low sulfur) results in extensive, deep-seated greisens with quartz-muscovite ± hematite or magnetite alteration. Peraluminous magma chemistry is defined as the whole-rock geochemistry of plutons where molecular Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O) ratios are greater than 1 and are typically higher than 1.1 (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

On the right, the variation diagram of A/CNK ratio versus weight percent SiO₂ for peraluminous Wilderness assemblage rocks of the latest Laramide shows most data are over 1.0 [7] and on the left, the variation diagram for metaluminous Morenci assemblage porphyry copper deposits of the middle Laramide (including altered samples) shows most data are under 1.1 A/CNK ratio [8] shows most data are under 1.1 A/CNK ratio.

A given peraluminous granitoid suite can commonly be divided into two main differentiation stages: Stage 3 biotite granodiorite associated with copper oxides and, locally, Stage 4 muscovite-garnet aplo-granite aplites and pegmatites associated with tungsten (and minor beryllium). An intermediate stage (Stage 3.5) is commonly present, featuring two micas (biotite and muscovite) and occasionally almandine-spessartine garnet. More fractionated phases occur later as Stage 4 differentiates into rare Stage 5 garnet schlieren fractionates that contain almandine-spessartine garnet and muscovite only (not biotite). Accessory minerals in Stage 4 to Stage 5 differentiates include rutile, niobian rutile, specular hematite, zircon, ilmeno-hematite, and monazite.

Ferric-ferrous ratios (Fe2O3/FeO) of plutonic rocks associated with peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits are in the oxidized range and typically exceed 0.9. More reduced variants also occur, for example, the Coronation Pluton in La Paz County (Figure 2). The more reduced variants appear to have a more gold-rich association, whereas silver is the main precious metal in the more oxidized copper-oxide greisen model, as indicated by the production data.

The main rock systems in the peraluminous igneous sequences are Stage 3 biotite granodiorites that differentiate into a Stage 3.5 biotite-muscovite-garnet granite. Near their roots, the two-mica-garnet granites can locally produce hydrous granitic phases of muscovite-garnet leucogranite and aplo-pegmatites. The copper-oxide greisen deposits seem to be associated with the earlier, more biotitic Stage 3 to Stage 3.5 phases. Tungsten (beryllium) deposits seem to be associated with the later, more leucocratic, muscovite- and garnet-rich Stage 4 phases.

Isotopic characteristics of peraluminous granitoids indicate a strong crustal component, where strontium initial ratios range from 0.709 to greater than 0.720. Peraluminous plutons invariably contain inherited zircons acquired from melt sources in the lower to middle crust, as discussed below.

Trace element enrichments in the greisens, for example in the Texas Canyon plutonic suite, include elevated niobium, tantalum, tungsten, and lithium [9]. Niobium ranges up to 141.5 ppm (up from 8.2 ppm), tantalum ranges up to 12.8 ppm (up from 0.9 ppm), lithium ranges up to 170 ppm (up from 20 ppm), and tungsten ranges up to 11 ppm (up from less than 1 ppm). The tungsten and beryllium-enrichment may be distributed into Stage 4 hydrothermal tungsten and beryllium minerals, such as scheelite, hübnerite, and beryl in the associated greisen deposits, and into Stage 4 tungsten-beryllium veins.

Similar mineralogy is present in the latest Laramide plutons in the Globe-Miami area of Gila County, south-central Arizona. There, the G porphyry and Y aplite, which are the latest peraluminous phases in the Schultze Granite, show distinct enrichment in tantalum, niobium, tungsten, and lithium [10]. The main phase of the Schultze Granite is probably a Stage 4, weakly peraluminous phase of the metaluminous, porphyry copper-related sequence at the Pinto Valley, Copper Cities, and portions of the Inspiration mines.

2.2 Metaluminous rock systems and petrochemistry

Plutonic rocks that are spatially and temporally associated with classic porphyry copper deposits (such as Morenci, Arizona) are metaluminous, calc-alkalic, hydrous (hornblende-bearing), oxidized (magnetite-sphene-bearing), and have normal halogen content, belonging to the magma-metal series [7]. These metaluminous magmatic suites are much less aluminum-rich than peraluminous suites. A representative suite of plutons associated with Arizona porphyry copper deposits is shown on a K2O versus SiO2 plot on the right sides of Figure 3 and Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The left panel shows most data from Tombstone assemblage rocks associated with lead-zinc-silver deposits are in the metaluminous, alkali-calcic field on a K2O versus SiO2 variation diagram. The right panel shows most data from Morenci assemblage rocks associated with porphyry copper deposits in Arizona including altered and unaltered igneous rocks plot in the metaluminous, calc-alkalic field of a K2O versus SiO2 variation diagram. Modified from Keith [7].

Plutonic rocks that are spatially and temporally associated with lead-zinc-silver deposits, and that are also known as “barren for economic copper” deposits (such as Tombstone, Arizona), are metaluminous, alkalic-calcic, hydrous (hornblende-bearing), oxidized (magnetite-sphene-bearing), and have normal halogen content, magma-metal series [11]. These alkali-calcic magmatic suites are more alkaline than the calc-alkalic suites. A representative suite of plutons associated with Arizona lead-zinc-silver deposits is shown on a K2O versus SiO2 plot on the left side of Figure 4. The alkali-calcic igneous rocks should not be confused with calc-alkalic, porphyry-copper-related plutons. Many exploration programs have foundered on drilling copper occurrences associated with alkali-calcic plutons.

2.3 Peraluminous mineralogy

The principal rock-forming minerals in peraluminous granitoids are quartz, muscovite, biotite, and K-feldspar, which typically occurs as perthitic microcline, along with albitic plagioclase. The major accessory minerals are biotite and phengitic muscovite (white micas with fairly large amounts of Mg and Fe). Hematite is a common accessory mineral in the biotite granodiorite. Zircon, ilmeno-hematite, apatite, and minor monazite can also occur in the biotite granodiorite.

Minor amounts of accessory minerals include almandine/spessartine garnet and monazite. Both garnet and monazite are persistent accessory minerals and are commonly concentrated in downstream placer deposits of heavy minerals. Niobium-bearing rutile could become an exploration guide to peraluminous copper oxide deposits, given its widespread presence in biotite aplite phases associated with the giant Gunnison copper oxide deposit near Dragoon in Cochise County, southeastern Arizona.

A distinctive petrologic feature of the Texas Canyon pluton is the presence of niobian rutile. Inspection of the petrochemical data in [9] shows that the niobium and tantalum contents of the Texas Canyon intrusive sequences systematically increase with differentiation. The intrusive sequences reach a maximum niobium content in the muscovite-rich greisens associated with the Gunnison copper-oxide deposits. Whether these geochemical and mineralogical characteristics can be generalized as an exploration guide to other copper oxide deposits remains to be seen, as niobium and tantalum data are not typically obtained in the literature. Interestingly, niobium, tantalum, and manganese occurrences, such as tantalite, columbite-Nb, and columbite-Mn, are mainly associated with differentiated aplites or pegmatites as products of peraluminous calc-alkalic systems, although columbite-tantalite-bearing pegmatites have yet to be identified.

2.4 Differentiation stages of latest laramide peraluminous granitoids

Peraluminous granitoid complexes typically have three differentiation stages:

  1. An early biotite peraluminous granodiorite (Stage 3) that typically contains 65% to 72 wt.% silica (Figure 5),

  2. A later two-mica (muscovite-biotite) granite (Stage 3.5) that contains 72–78% silica (Figure 6), and

  3. A later, more evolved two-mica granite (Stage 4) (Figure 7) with minor amounts of phases (Stage 5) containing almandine-spessartine garnet (Figure 8).

Figure 5.

Close-up view (field of view is 0.6 m [or 2 ft]) of a ptygmatic fold that affects a Stage 3 biotite granodiorite (Soldier Canyon Gneiss of [13]), located across the road from the Babad Do–Ag Vista on the Mount Lemmon Highway in the Santa Catalina Mountains [14].

Figure 6.

Photograph of a hand specimen (10 cm or 4 inches wide) of Wilderness Granite, a Stage 3.5 two-mica granite that contains feldspar, quartz, muscovite, biotite, and trace garnet, Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona [14].

Figure 7.

Photograph of a hand specimen (7.5 cm or 3 inches wide) mylonitically foliated, Stage 4, Lemmon Rock leucogranite, a muscovite-garnet granite, Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona [14].

Figure 8.

Photograph of a hand specimen (22 cm or 10 inches long) of highly evolved, Stage 4 garnet-muscovite, schlieren, aplo-granite from Summerhaven, Santa Catalina Mountains, southeastern Arizona [14].

2.5 Stage 3.0 biotite granodiorite

Peraluminous biotite granodiorite is the major voluminous phase that is spatially associated with the copper-oxide deposits. Examples of Arizona biotite granitoids include:

  • The biotite-aplite association at the Gunnison deposit in Cochise County,

  • The biotite granodiorite dikes at the Red Hills deposit in Pinal County,

  • The Manitou biotite granite pluton adjacent to Carlota in Gila County,

  • Possibly the biotite granodiorites associated with the Zonia copper oxide deposit in Yavapai County, and

  • The biotite granitic aplites associated with the copper oxide deposit at Coronation in La Paz County.

In the Santa Catalina Mountains, Stage 3 biotite granodiorites constitute the main volume of the forerange gneiss complex. Petrographic mineral quantities of the granodiorites range from 32.9 to 29.9% quartz, 37.5 to 26.6% plagioclase (An20-30 or oligoclase), 25.7 to 29.7% K-feldspar (microcline), 1.7 to 7.4% biotite, 0.3 to 2% muscovite, and 0.1 to 0.4% magnetite [12]. A photograph of a typical biotite granodiorite that has been sheared by Maricopa thrust deformation is shown in Figure 5.

The biotite granodiorite porphyry, known as the G phase of the Schultze Granite, may be associated with the Van Dyke chrysocolla-azurite copper oxide deposit beneath the town of Miami in Gila County, based on data on Schultze Granite phases [10]. More speculatively, the G phase of the Schultze may be associated with the granite porphyry phase of the Schultze Granite in the Live Oak portion of the Inspiration copper deposit. The Live Oak mine locality is famous for gem silica (chrysocolla) mineral specimens.

The rock system stages in peraluminous, calc-alkalic, oxidized systems can be economically significant. Within the peraluminous differentiation system, copper may be held in biotite and/or magnetite as a compatible element within the Stage 3 biotite granodiorite. In the Texas Canyon pluton of Cochise County, Arizona, the biotite-dominated Stage 3 phase of the Texas Canyon pluton contained 21 ppm copper [9]. In contrast, the slightly later biotite aplite phase, which is intimately associated with the Gunnison copper-oxide skarn system, contains 1 ppm copper or less, according to copper data [9]. Hence, about 20 ppm copper would have been available to be incorporated into the incompatible hydrothermal water component, along with aluminum and silica. This chemistry could then precipitate copper silicates, such as chrysocolla.

2.6 Stage 3.5 two-mica granites

Intermediate phases (Stage 3.5) between the Stage 3 biotite granodiorite and the two-mica, garnet-bearing Stage 4 systems may also be associated with copper-oxide deposits of moderate to large size. The Little Hill copper-oxide deposit is an example in Pinal County, as is the Azurite deposit south of Globe in Gila County, Arizona, which is associated with the top of the two-mica Solitude Granite.

Representative petrography for the Wilderness Granite, which is a Stage 3.5 garnet-bearing, two-mica granite (Figure 6) in the fore range of the Santa Catalina Mountains north of Tucson, is spatially associated with copper-oxide mineralization at the Pontatoc mine. This two-mica granite consists of 42% quartz, 32% oligoclase (An2.0–2.5), 13% orthoclase, 6% muscovite, 4% biotite, and 3% microcline, with trace garnet [12].

Stage 3.5 brings in muscovite, which may not incorporate copper, and magnetite may decrease drastically. This mineralogical change may reverse the compatibility characteristics of copper, which changes from compatible in biotite and magnetite stability to incompatible in progressively more muscovite-garnet-rich assemblages.

From a field petrographic perspective, the transition from Stage 3 biotite granodiorite to Stage 4 muscovite-garnet leucogranite may be significant for copper-related exploration. In this context, the Stage 3.5 two-mica granites might be the most spatially significant rock system tied to peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits.

2.7 Stage 4 garnet-bearing leucogranites

More evolved Stage 4 aplite-pegmatites and leucogranites (Figure 7) occur near the roofs of differentiated peraluminous sill complexes. For example, a large sill-like body of pegmatitic garnet-muscovite leucogranite, informally named the Lemmon Rock leucogranite, occurs in the Santa Catalina Mountains on Mount Lemmon, in the roof of the Wilderness peraluminous sill complex.

An example of a Stage 5 aplo-pegmatite is the spectacular outcrop of garnet schlieren in the southern part of Summerhaven in the Santa Catalina Mountains (Figure 8) [14, 15]. The garnet-muscovite aplo-granite of Figure 8 shows a flow-differentiation pattern, emplaced in an active, deep-seated tectonic environment in the midcrust.

3. Mineral deposit description

Specularite and chrysocolla are the main ore minerals in the copper-oxide greisen deposits. The peraluminous plutons typically contain low sulfur and high alumina, which typically results in an early magnetite-orthoclase-quartz assemblage and in a later, coarse muscovite-quartz-specularite greisen assemblage.

3.1 Ore mineralogy

Iron and copper as “oxide” minerals (in the context of leach processing via solvent extraction – electrowinning or SX–EW) are characteristic of peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits. The peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits can form large, low-grade bodies (0.2–0.5% Cu) of chrysocolla (Figure 9) that are closely associated with primary specular hematite. The specularite can oxidize into red, earthy hematite. Pyrite is conspicuously absent or sparse.

Figure 9.

Photograph of a micromount of botryoidal chrysocolla on hematite, Burro Pit, Johnson Mine, Gunnison Copper Project, Cochise County, Arizona (photo by Rolf Luetcke; field of view is 4 mm wide).

At the Gunnison deposit in the Little Dragoon Mountains of Cochise County in southeastern Arizona, copper-oxide mineralization occurs to a depth of approximately 490 m (1,600 feet) and lies immediately beneath thin Miocene-Pliocene gravel formations. The mineralization is dominantly chrysocolla, with minor tenorite, other copper oxides, and minor secondary chalcocite. Copper-oxide mineralization is present in the calc-silicate skarns as fracture coatings and vein fillings, mainly in the form of chrysocolla. The remainder of the oxide mineralization occurs as replacement patches and disseminations. Copper-oxide mineralization extends over a strike length of 3,380 m (11,100 feet), has an aerial extent across strike of up to 915 m (3,000 feet), and is more than 275 m (900 feet) thick in places [16].

Unlike the secondary enrichment of classic porphyry copper deposits, where a leached iron cap is typical, a leached iron cap has not yet been observed above the copper “oxides” (chrysocolla, minor malachite, and azurite). Similarly, strong chalcocite enrichment blankets beneath the copper-oxide zone are not observed or are thin and insignificant. There simply was not enough sulfur as pyrite in the peraluminous copper-oxide deposits to produce acid leaching and subsequent secondary copper sulfide precipitation as chalcocite beneath oxidized copper zones.

The most distinctive feature of peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits is their “oxide” (in terms of leach processing) mineralogy. Copper mainly resides in chrysocolla, which was probably formed as an amorphous, high-temperature mineraloid/colloid. Chrysocolla occurs as botryoidal forms or fracture fillings (Figure 9). The apparent primary nature of the chrysocolla is supported by its common occurrence with primary specular hematite, which is the main iron mineral in this deposit type.

Pyrite, bornite, and chalcopyrite, which are common in classic porphyry copper environments, are generally absent or have low abundance in peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits. The low sulfur content also results in the development of major specular hematite alteration mineralogy. Other copper oxide minerals in the peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits include azurite and malachite, but these are relatively minor compared to chrysocolla. Cuprite and native copper can also be present, but only in relatively low amounts. The close association of scheelite, powellite, hübnerite, and goshenite beryl also suggests a mineral assemblage that is typical of silica- and alumina-rich greisens.

3.2 Alteration mineralogy

Early alteration assemblages in peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits are dominated by adularia, K-feldspar, and quartz. The adularia-quartz alteration is followed by strong, coarse-grained muscovite-quartz greisen-style alteration. This greisen-style alteration forms large vein envelopes as well as pervasive late deuteric alteration of the peraluminous granitic host rocks.

Greisen-style alteration is typically associated with both biotite granodiorites (Stage 3) and biotite-muscovite granites (Stage 4). Garnet may be an accessory mineral in the biotite-muscovite granites.

Possible later supergene dehydration of primary chrysocolla can occur in the presence of initial acetic acid from rotting fleshy cacti (saguaro or prickly pear). The acetic acid is then reduced to produce various glycolates, such as lazaraskeite from dehydrated chrysocolla [17] and rasmussenite [18].

3.3 Mineral zoning

Initial proximal zonation is probably related to muscovite-orthoclase-quartz greisens with minor pyrite and tungsten-minor beryllium mineralization, which may be coeval with copper oxide deposition. An example can be found in the Burro open pit at Johnson Camp (now part of the Gunnison project) in Cochise County, southeastern Arizona. Minor lead and zinc might be deposited in a halo environment outboard from the copper oxides.

Orthoclase-quartz veins ± magnetite, without pyrite or secondary biotite or copper sulfides, are typically the earliest stage and precede the larger volume, muscovite-quartz-minor pyrite greisens. The greisen mineralization may precede the copper and iron oxide assemblages that constitute the main volume of mineralization.

3.4 Depositional model for peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits

The sulfur-poor and aluminum- and silica-rich, peraluminous, “cold granite” depositional environment of the peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits is very different from that of the hotter, metaluminous, porphyry copper deposits. The peraluminous copper-oxide deposit type incorporates the stability of primary copper-oxides (mainly the copper silicate chrysocolla, and lesser amounts of the copper carbonates azurite and malachite). Sulfides, mainly pyrite and minor chalcopyrite, are present but are not considered as economically significant as the copper oxides.

Fluid releases associated with peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits appear to be associated with Stage 3 biotite granodiorite porphyries and aplo-pegmatites (both aplites and pegmatites). Additionally, later-stage (Stage 3.5) muscovite-biotite granite systems may be capable of releasing copper oxide-stable hydrothermal fluids. A chemical model for peraluminous copper-oxide deposits is shown in Eq. (1).

CuCl2+ Cu(OH)2+2H4SiO4+0.5H2->Cu2-xAlx(H2-xSi2O5)(OH)4.4H2+ Cl2E1

*Note: in the above reaction, x = 1. If extra aluminum or silicic acid exceeds copper, quartz/chalcedony or allophane may form as high-temperature colloids.

Hydrothermal fluids released during the final crystallization of relatively “cold” biotite granodiorite are expected to be moderate-salinity and high-aluminum fluids. In these hydrothermal fluids, copper chloride complexes and copper hydroxide complexes are stable, along with silicic acid and aluminum hydroxide. In this setting, quartz and allophane are intimate associates of chrysocolla. If carbon dioxide is present, primary azurite and malachite may be stable.

The initial hypogene fluids are predicted to be relatively low-temperature (in the vicinity of 350–250°C). Fluid inclusion data is needed to constrain the hydrothermal stages. At this point, we are not aware of any constraining fluid inclusion data.

A simplified model showing a depositional sequence for the peraluminous copper-oxide greisen model is outlined below:

  1. Emplacement of peraluminous, biotite granodiorite porphyries (Stage 3) to slightly later, more oxidized muscovite-biotite granites (Stage 3.5), aplites, and pegmatites follows progressive biotite disappearance.

  2. Quartz-orthoclase ± magnetite veins and/or low-temperature skarns (tremolite-actinolite, grossular garnet) form next.

  3. Next, minor amounts of sulfides (pyrite, chalcopyrite, bornite, and/or chalcocite) are deposited.

  4. Next, quartz-muscovite ± pyrite, scheelite, powellite, hübnerite, beryl (goshenite) veins, and greisens are deposited.

  5. Primary botryoidal chrysocolla is formed coevally with specular hematite (oxidized to red hematite-goethite), quartz, muscovite, with minor magnetite and minor amounts of azurite, malachite, kaolinite, and allophane in the greisens.

Minor amounts of pyrite are slightly more abundant than chalcopyrite and bornite, and there is only trace sphalerite ± tenorite. The above depositional sequence implies that the copper oxide and iron oxide mineralization may have postdated the sulfide mineralization, as the copper oxide and iron oxide deposition would follow the aluminum- and silica-enriched hydrothermal fluid of peraluminous composition. This paragenetic sequence is speculative and remains to be confirmed.

The above sequence reflects a progressive oxidation from magmatic Stage 3 to Stage 3.5 crystallization to late-stage copper and iron oxides. The hematite mineralogy present in the peraluminous Texas Canyon pluton differs from magnetite-sphene assemblages of the metaluminous sequences associated with classic porphyry copper deposits [9].

Conventional interpretations maintain that the copper and iron oxide mineralization is supergene in character. However, several observations allow for the possible interpretation of hypogene character.

Firstly, specularite and magnetite, which are both primary minerals, co-occur with the copper oxides. The presence of red, earthy hematite, however, suggests that there has been some oxidation of the primary iron oxide mineralogy to supergene red, earthy hematite.

Secondly, primary sulfides occur in the presumed oxide zone with the copper oxide minerals. This co-occurrence is anomalous in that leached, oxidized lithocaps over classic porphyry copper deposits contain no sulfides. For example, at the I-10 deposit (now the northern part of the Gunnison project), the paragenetic order shows that primary pyrite, chalcopyrite-molybdenite, bornite, and possibly later chalcocite are spatially associated with soluble copper oxide minerals [19]. This close spatial association is consistent with late-stage primary oxidation of remaining low-temperature, copper-silica- and aluminum-rich hydrothermal solutions. These solutions deposited oxide minerals in dissolution vugs and fractures associated with the sulfides. Also, the presence of hübnerite and goshenite beryl in the diopside-actinolite-garnet-talc skarn rocks that host the copper sulfides and the iron oxide mineralogy supports a primary origin for the copper-oxide mineralogy.

4. Examples

4.1 Peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits in Pinal County

At present, at least 14 mineral districts have been identified in Pinal County (Table 1, with locations of districts shown in Figure 10). Additional details for these districts are described in [5].

District County Igneous rock Age (Ma) Minerals References
Little Hill(1) Pinal Little Hill muscovite alaskite, rhyolite dikes, pegmatites, transition gneiss. 63.8 ± 17.2 Ma U–Pb date on zircon of Little Hill alaskite.50.3 Ma K–Ar date on biotite in transition gneiss Chrysocolla, hematite, malachite; minor pyrite, Cu sulfides and molybdenite [2, 2022]
North Star(2) Pinal North Star monzonite and granite porphyry Analog to the 59.3 ± 1 Ma U–Pb date on granite gneiss of Newman Peak Chrysocolla, hematite, malachite, turquoise; minor pyrite and tenorite [20, 23]
Newman Peak(3) Pinal Granite gneiss of Newman Peak (Picacho Mountains). Analog to the 59.3 ± 1 Ma U–Pb date on granite gneiss of Newman Peak Chrysocolla [24]
Durham(4) Pinal Porphyritic biotite granodiorite Cooling age of 27.7 ± 0.7 Ma determined by K–Ar dating on biotite; by analogy with Suizo Chrysocolla, hematite, chlorite, malachite, minor chalcopyrite, chalcocite [25, 26]
Suizo(5) Pinal Leucocratic muscovite-biotite granite Analog with Black Mountain Chrysocolla, minor hematite, chlorite, malachite; minor azurite, wulfenite, cerussite, plancheite, conichalcite, shattuckite [26, 27]
Red Hills(6) Pinal Quartz-rich rhyolitic dikes (TKq unit) [27] Cross-cut possibly 70.7 Ma andesitic dikes. Chrysocolla, hematite [10, 20, 27, 28]
96 Hills(7) Pinal Biotite-muscovite granite (Younger granite or Yg unit [29]) 61.4 ± 3.2 Ma fission-track date on garnet Chrysocolla, hematite, malachite [2830]
Teacup(8) Pinal Apilitic phases of the Teacup composite pluton 62.9 ± 1.3 Ma K–Ar date on biotite and 61.4 ± 3.2 Ma date by fission-track on garnet Chrysocolla, malachite, limonite [28, 30, 31]
Golden Bell(9) Pinal Apilitic phases of the peraluminous biotite granite phase of the Teacup composite pluton 62.9 ± 1.3 Ma K–Ar on biotite and 61.4 ± 3.2 Ma by fission-track on garnet Chrysocolla, malachite, hematite [30, 32]
Hayden Peak (10) Pinal Aplite-pegmatite dike swarm near the contact of the border phase and core phase of Sacaton Peak Granite [33] 61–49 Ma K–Ar date Chrysocolla, hematite [33, 34]
Bianco(11) Pinal Biotite granite dike phase of the Sacaton Peak pluton 61–49 Ma K–Ar date Chrysocolla, hematite [33, 34]
Sacaton Butte Southeast(12) Pinal Granite phase of Sacaton Mountains stock 61–49 Ma K–Ar date Chrysocolla, hematite [33, 34]
Casa Grande Mountains.(13) Pinal Alaskitic granodiorite, aplite, and pegmatites as small sill-like intrusions and dikes 69 Ma U–Pb date at Signal Peak, 3 to 6.4 km (4 miles) north of Casa Grande. Chrysocolla [21, 3335]
Estrella – Sunrise(14) Pinal Aplite and pegmatite dikes, sills, and small granitic intrusions – possibly the White Granite [36] Cretaceous-Tertiary ~ 69 Ma, by analogy with Signal Peak. The fission track cooling age of 24.7 ± 0.4 Ma establishes the uplift of the lower plate. Chrysocolla in quartz, minor hematite [36, 37]

Table 1.

Examples of peraluminous calc-alkalic copper-oxide greisen occurrences in Pinal County.

Figure 10.

Map of Pinal County showing inferred lower plate domains in red and locations of peraluminous copper-oxide deposits, modified from the state geologic map [38]. White letters represent mountain ranges: WT – White Tanks, E–SM – Estrella-South Mountain, S – Sacaton, CG – Casa Grande, P – Picacho, D–S – Durham Hills-Suizo, T – Tortilla, TO – Tortolita, SC – Santa Catalina, PM – Pinal Mountains, ST–P – Santa Teresa-Pinaleno. Northeast-trending heavy black lines indicate locations of cross-sections in later figures. Numbers refer to deposits in Table 1. Pinal County is shown within a rectangle on the Arizona map in Figure 11.

4.2 Other Arizona peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits

Continued inspection of other Arizona copper oxide deposits has revealed an additional 17 copper-oxide greisen mineral systems (Table 2 and Figure 11) that are spatially associated with peraluminous calc-alkalic plutons and/or dikes in Arizona.

District County Igneous rock Age (Ma) Minerals References
Estrella–Crusher(15) Mari-copa Applite and pegmatite dikes and sills, along with small granitic intrusions – possibly the White Granite Tertiary ~ 69 Ma, by analogy with Signal Peak Chrysocolla in quartz, beryl, muscovite, tourmaline, garnet [36]
White Tank(16) Mari-copa Fine-grained biotite granite or granodiorite U–Pb date on zircon was 56.2 ± 14 Ma on fine-grained biotite granodiorite Chrysocolla, malachite; minor Cu sulfides and molybdenite [20, 21]
Sar Jak(17) Mari-copa Medium-grained biotite granite or granodiorite and fine-grained felsic dikes 68.4 Ma K–Ar date on biotite Chrysocolla, hematite [20, 39]
Vulture(18) Mari-copa Medium-grained biotite granodiorite and fine-grained felsic dikes 68.4 Ma K–Ar date on biotite Chrysocolla, hematite [20, 39, 40]
Coro-nation(19) La Paz Lower part of Coronation Sill Complex (biotite granodiorite) intrudes lower plate Orocopia Schist in the footwall of the Plomosa Fault. 66–68 Ma U–Pb date on magmatic zircon Chrysocolla in quartz, hematite, malachite, minor pyrite [1, 4143]
Pusch Ridge(20) Pima Peraluminous biotite alaskite 44–47 Ma U–Pb date, by analogy with the nearby Pontatoc Mine. Chrysocolla, hematite, malachite, minor glycolate group minerals, minor wulfenite, and mimetite [18, 44, 45]
Pontatoc(21) Pima Peraluminous biotite alaskite 44–47 Ma U–Pb date Chrysocolla, hematite, malachite; minor pyrite, copper sulfides and molybdenite [12, 4447]
Mt. Lemmon(22) Pima Lemmon Rock muscovite-garnet leucogranite 47 Ma K–Ar date on muscovite Chrysocolla, malachite, azurite, minor Cu sulfides [20, 48]
Centurion (South Star) in the Northern Dragoon Mountains.(23) Cochise Biotite aplite phase of Texas Canyon Pluton 57–55 U–Pb date on zircon Chrysocolla, malachite, hematite, minor cuprite [16, 4953]
Gunnison (North Star, I-10, Johnson-Burro Pits)(24) Cochise Peraluminous biotite aplite and biotite granite porphyry of the Texas Canyon pluton 57–55 U–Pb date on zircon; 54.6 ± 0.2 Ma Rb–Sr isochron on Stage 4 Adams Peak leucogranite Chrysocolla, hematite; minor scheelite [16, 40, 53, 54]
Carlota(25) Gila Manitou Granite (composed essentially of quartz, orthoclase,muscovite, and a little plagioclase and biotite; plagioclase (sodic oligoclase), rare magnetite, zircon 60 Ma Chrysocolla, hematite; minor azurite, powellite [10, 55, 56]
Azurite (Blue Ball)(26) Gila Solitude Granite 60 Ma Azurite, malachite, no mention of chrysocolla or hematite [10, 20, 57, 58]
Solitude(27) Gila Solitude Granite 60 Ma Chrysocolla, hematite, magnetite [10, 20, 55]
Van Dyke(28) Gila Porphyritic biotite granodiorite; G phase of Schultze Granite. 62 U–Pb date on G porphyry Chrysocolla, hematite, azurite, malachite, cuprite, and tenorite [10, 55, 59]
New York–California(29) Gila By analogy with Van Dyke 62 Ma Azurite, chrysocolla [55, 60]
Live Oak-Warrior(30) Gila Possibly G porphyry phase of Schultze Granite? 62 Ma Chrysocolla, azurite, malachite; minor powellite, libethenite, lindgrenite. [10, 55, 56, 60]
Zonia(31) Yavapai Biotite granodiorite and felsite (most closely associated with copper oxides). 60–70 Ma Chrysocolla, hematite; minor malachite, azurite, cuprite. [19, 6163]

Table 2.

Examples of peraluminous calc-alkalic copper-oxide occurrences in Arizona beyond Pinal County.

Figure 11.

Map of Lower plate windows and peraluminous (blue stars) and metaluminous (yellow stars) copper deposits relative to the Maricopa thrust system in southern Arizona. Pink represents lower plate windows. The rectangle outlines the area of Figure 10 and the numbers refer to deposits in Table 2. Modified from [11, 64].

4.3 Texas Canyon – Gunnison project example

The best-researched example of the peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits at this time is the Gunnison deposit in Cochise County, Arizona [16]. The Gunnison deposit consists of a large copper-oxide deposit, mainly as chrysocolla, hosted in Lower Paleozoic strata on the north, east, and south margins of the Texas Canyon pluton (Figure 12 and Figure 13).

Figure 12.

Photograph of Texas Canyon Granite, looking northwest from the area on Interstate 10 in the Little Dragoon Mountains, Cochise County, southeastern Arizona (photo by Jan Rasmussen).

Figure 13.

Geologic map of plutonic rocks, ages, and magma-metal classes of mineral districts in the Little Dragoon Mountains, Cochise County, southeastern Arizona. Geologic map from [49]. Orange outline represents metaluminous, alkali-calcic, Zn–Cu deposits of 67–63 Ma (Johnson Camp Supersystem); blue outline represents Stage 3 peraluminous copper-oxide deposits of 58–56 Ma; dark blue outline represents Stage 4 peraluminous W–Be deposits of 56–54 Ma (Texas Canyon Supersystem).

The geologic map of the Texas Canyon plutonic suite in the Little Dragoon Mountains of Cochise County, Arizona [49] has been modified in Figure 13 to show the ages and magma-metal classes of peraluminous Stage 3 (outlined in blue) and Stage 4 (outlined in dark blue) mineral districts. The petrology and mineral deposit geology of the Texas Canyon-Gunnison peraluminous copper-oxide greisen system are well documented [9, 49, 53].

Mineral districts associated with the Texas Canyon plutonic suite in Cochise County (Figure 13) include the following three deposit types:

  1. Zinc-copper deposits are associated with mafic, hornblende-biotite monzodiorites that are classified as metaluminous, alkali-calcic (MAC) and are outlined with an orange line. The Peabody sill of metaluminous, hornblende-rich monzodiorite at the Peabody Mine is intimately associated with zinc-copper replacement mineralization in the Horquilla Formation [49, 65, 66]. The Peabody sill is inferred to correlate with monzodiorite inclusions in the Texas Canyon intrusion, which have yielded U–Pb age dates on zircons in the xenocrysts of 6763 Ma [50, 52].

  2. Copper oxide mineralization is associated with biotite granite that is classified as peraluminous calc-alkalic [PCAo] Stage 3, dated at 5755 Ma based on zircon age dates [50, 52] and is outlined with a blue line. These deposits are associated with biotite aplite dike swarms and masses located between the copper-oxide deposits and the main Stage 3 biotite-dominated phase of the Texas Canyon pluton.

  3. Tungsten and minor beryllium deposits are associated with two-mica granites (the Adams Peak leucogranite and related muscovite-garnet aplite dikes) and are outlined with a dark blue line. They are associated with peraluminous calc-alkalic [PCAo] Stage 4 deposits and are dated at 55–54 Ma, based on an Rb–Sr isochron [53].

Peraluminous copper-oxide deposits in the Gunnison project include the giant Gunnison copper-oxide system that occurs in contact metasomatic skarns on the north and east sides of the Texas Canyon pluton. Previously mined copper-oxide deposits include the Burro Pit at Johnson, the Centurion Mine near Dragoon, and mines at the South Star prospect southwest of Dragoon, which were designated as the Copper Area [49]. Associated copper-oxide skarn deposits that are now part of the Gunnison project [16] include the former I-10 copper-oxide skarn deposits [19] and the Burro and Johnson open-pit copper-oxide deposits [54]. At present, approximately three million tons of copper have been mined or drill-identified, which makes this model a significant exploration target [16]. Room exists for at least a possible additional five million tons of copper.

The large size of the peraluminous Texas Canyon pluton source may be directly related to the size of the copper-oxide deposits at the Gunnison project. The known volume of magma represented by the present-day exposures of Texas Canyon Granite, as mapped [49], is about 150 cubic km. The main Texas Canyon pluton contains about 21 ppm Cu, whereas the later biotite-aplite phases associated with the Gunnison/I-10 copper skarns contain 1 ppm Cu or less. The copper abundance data suggest that about 20 ppm of copper could have been released into hydrothermal fractionates emanating from the Stage 3 Texas Canyon biotite quartz monzonite pluton. If the entire plutonic volume was depleted by 20 ppm Cu, based on the bulk geochemistry data [53], the pluton could have yielded approximately eight million tons of Cu. This amount of potentially released copper is sufficient to account for the three million tons of Cu based on the drill-indicated plus produced copper.

The hydrothermal fluid release, triggered by the fractionation of the peraluminous Texas Canyon granite (Stage 3) to the biotite-aplite phases (Stage 4), deposited chrysocolla, magnetite, and specularite into the lower Paleozoic Bolsa Quartzite and the lower Abrigo Formation bordering the Texas Canyon pluton. To a lesser extent, the upper Abrigo, Martin, and Escabrosa calcareous formations were also mineralized. Additional chrysocolla occurrences have been described to the south in the Centurion and South Star prospects and are not currently included in the existing resource. The specularite and magnetite were later oxidized to secondary, red, earthy hematite, which is preserved with chrysocolla.

The formation of the Stage 3 Gunnison copper-oxide deposit was quickly followed by a differentiation step that may have been associated with regional stress reorientation related to the plate-scale stress change at about 56 Ma. This stress reorientation formed a late Stage 4, two-mica- and garnet-bearing aplite/pegmatite complex, herein called the Adams Peak leucogranite. The stress reorientation is shown by the change from east-northeast-trending biotite aplites common on the east side of the Texas Canyon pluton [49] to northeast-trending muscovite garnet aplites associated with tungsten-beryllium veins related to the Adams Peak leucogranite.

The late Stage 4 magmato-hydrothermal alteration spread to the northeast and northwest, forming the Bluebird tungsten (with minor beryllium) veins and associated greisens. The Bluebird system also includes the Tungsten King tungsten deposit, which was emplaced in a mineralized vein along the Tungsten King fault to the northwest. This fault forms the western boundary of the Dragoon lower plate terrane. The main Stage 3 to Stage 3.5 Texas Canyon pluton is the inferred source for the Stage 3 copper-oxide mineralization in the Gunnison system. The later Stage 4 Adams Peak leucogranite is the inferred source for the tungsten (minor beryllium) vein system.

The Texas Canyon pluton is well-dated radiometrically by an Rb/Sr isochron (54.6 ± 0.2 Ma) for the Stage 4 Adams Peak Leucogranite and related muscovite-garnet aplites associated with the tungsten-beryllium vein deposits at the Bluebird Mine [53]. The main Stage 3 biotite granite pluton has yielded two U–Pb zircon age dates of 57.9 ± 0.8 Ma [67] and 55.5 ± 1.9 Ma [50]. In addition, a Stage 3 biotite-minor muscovite aplite has yielded a 57 ± 1.0 Ma age date [52].

5. Production and resources

Significant amounts of copper have been produced from several of the peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits. The Little Hill Mine in Pima County, the Johnson Open Pit in Cochise County, the Carlota Mine in Gila County, and the Zonia Mine in Yavapai County, Arizona, have had significant copper production (Table 3). The Little Hill deposit was also mined for copper-bearing smelter flux.

District County Years Ore (St) Cu (lb) Pb (lb) Au (oz) Ag (oz)
Little Hill Pinal 1929–1981 827,081 5,673,121 89,684 351 15,378
North Star Pinal 1823–1970 3,764 104,587 17 959
Durham Pinal 1948–1962 5,991 188,105 52 1,553
Suizo Pinal 1956 54 1,900 0 0 0
Coronation La Paz 1945–1950 115 4,035 8 15
Pontatoc Pima 1907–1935 5,004 415,824 176 1 2,323
Mt. Lemmon Pima 1935 2 422 0 0 0
Gunnison (Gunnison) Cochise 2021 1,208,000
Gunnison Johnson Open Pit (some SX–EW) Cochise 1975–1981 11,185,207 67,763,292
Gunnison Johnson Open Pit SX–EW Cochise 1975–2015 31,848,413 193,315,490 0 0 0
Gunnison Burro Pit Cochise 1960–1970 298,981 3,915,800 2,605
Gunnison Centurion Cochise 1911–1944 1,317 101,884 1 326
Gunnison Copper Chief Cochise 1903–1921 12,650 1,119,040 1,360 6,157
Gunnison Black Prince Cochise 1902–1933 1,016 186,513 2 5,120
Gunnison Keystone Cochise 1912–1959 3,523 287,538 4,495 22 8,736
Carlota Gila 2008–2018 42,430,000 18,105,600
Carlota Gila 2019–2024 ? 55,997,414
Warrior? Gila 1902–1937 348,493 44,397,121 40 10 29,051
New York-California Gila 1916–1940 146 33,934 0 5,089
Van Dyke Gila 1929–1945 295 11,800,000
Van Dyke Gila 1988–1989 In Situ Leach 4,000,000
Zonia Yavapai 1901–1975 13,389,797 32,911,977 801 240 3,950

Table 3.

Production from lower plate, peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits. Pre-1983 data is from [68]; post-1983 data is from [69]; Carlota data for 2019–2024 is from [70]. Burro Pit produced 15,400 lb of zinc [68]. Not included here are numerous other mines, names, and pits with production.

Only 4 of the 31 peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits have published resource data, but the Gunnison project in Cochise County, Arizona, has published drill-indicated and inferred resources that are significant (Table 4). Copper-oxide mineralization at the Gunnison project extends over a strike length of 3,380 m (11,100 feet), has an aerial extent across strike of up to 915 m (3,000 feet), and is more than 275 m (900 feet) thick in places [16]. Other deposits, for example, Little Hill Mine and Red Hills, may have additional resources at today’s copper price. At least two deposits, Durham Hills and Red Hills, are being mined for decorative stone. Average copper grades range from 0.18 to 0.45% Cu, which, at current copper prices, may be economic.

District County Year of Est. Ore (St) Cu (lb) Cu %
Gunnison measured and indicated resources (open pit) Cochise 9/4/2024 831,600,000 5,104,000 0.31
Gunnison inferred resources (open pit) Cochise 9/4/2024 79,600,000 325,000,000 0.20
Gunnison North Star measured and indicated (leach) Cochise 10/1/2016 911,600,000 5,315,000,000 0.29
Gunnison North Star inferred (leach) Cochise 10/1/2016 240,900,000 1,070,000,000 0.22
Johnson Camp (Gunnison inferred + produced) Cochise 2012 1,499,400,000
Carlota (inferred + produced) Gila 2012 705,600,000
Carlota Gila 12/31/2014 4,887 43,758,000 0.45
Van Dyke indicated Gila 1/9/2020 97,637,000 517,000,000 lb sol. Cu 0.24
Van Dyke inferred Gila 1/9/2020 168,026,000 399,000,000 lb sol. Cu 0.19
Zonia indicated Yavapai 11/8/2024 112,000,000 668,000,000 lb Cu 0.18
Zonia inferred Yavapai 11/8/2024 63,000,000 320,000,000 lb Cu 0.18

Table 4.

Reserves or resources of lower-plate, peraluminous, copper-oxide deposits. Data sources are Van Dyke [59], Gunnison [16, 71]; Zonia [63]; Gunnison and Carlota (inferred + produced) Global [72]. Inferred mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Contained copper estimates of combined production, reserves, and all categories of resources [72] include the Johnson Camp and Carlota deposits (Table 3 and Table 4). These estimates are considerably larger than the recorded production or drill-identified resources from these deposits. Hence, it is probable that ultimate production from peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits may have considerable additional potential. No molybdenum production or resource has been reported from any peraluminous copper-oxide deposit, even though molybdenite and powellite are mineralogically present in several deposits (for example, at Gunnison and Carlota). Hence, a lack of economically significant molybdenum content may be a distinguishing characteristic of peraluminous copper-oxide deposits compared to the widespread presence of economic molybdenum in classic porphyry copper deposits.

Byproduct silver content, but very low gold content, is characteristic of oxidized, peraluminous, calc-alkalic plutons. However, the weakly oxidized, peraluminous, calcic to calc-alkalic plutonic sill complex at the Coronation prospect in La Paz County (number 19 on Figure 11) has a higher gold content [43].

6. Tectonic setting

The peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits occupy a unique tectonic setting as lower plate windows that expose a midcrustal belt in the Basin and Range geomorphic province in Arizona. This unique tectonic setting includes the zone of well-known “metamorphic core complexes” [73]. However, a partial redefinition of this zone includes a broader area of lower plate windows. The lower plate windows of crystalline rocks occur northeast of a regional thrust system referred to as the Maricopa thrust system [11, 14, 64, 74] (Figure 14).

Figure 14.

Simplified diagram of the Maricopa Thrust, showing the Farallon Plate in blue, the North American Plate in tan, and the Santa Catalina window into the lower plate in blue. K is Kitt Peak, SC is Santa Catalina Mountains, T is Tucson Mountains, and X is the location of the 1980 Anschutz (Phillips) AZ-1 drill hole [14].

6.1 Lower plate of the Maricopa thrust

The Maricopa thrust may be the largest Laramide structure in Arizona and adjacent regions. The Farallon plate was flatly subducted under the North American plate during the Eocene (Figure 14). This compressional tectonic activity left southwest-directed foliation in the lower plate in the core of the Santa Catalina-Rincon crystalline complex, as well as in the nearby Picacho, Durham Hills, Suizo, and Tortolita Mountains crystalline complexes.

Lower plate windows into the Maricopa thrust were later exposed by up-arching in broad anticlinal folds during the compressional Galiuro orogeny [11, 64] in the Oligocene-Miocene. The anticlinal uplifts form a northwest-southeast-trending anticlinal zone located northeast of the leading edge of the Maricopa thrust (Figure 11) and southwest of the Transition Zone physiographic province. These anticlinal uplifts contain a series of crystalline cores of peraluminous granites.

The broad zone of anticlinal uplifts resulted from crustal softening due to the influx of mantle heat from the collapsing Farallon slab as Oligocene-Miocene magmatic activity returned from the east and spread westward. The broad folds were also triggered by weak regional compression generated at the subduction zone. The mid-Tertiary uplift was accompanied by extensive gravity-driven tectonic denudation of the former Maricopa thrust. These low-angle normal denudational faults have formerly been called “detachment” faults.

The Maricopa thrust system extends southeastward from the Old Woman, Big Maria, and Little Maria Mountains of southeastern California, through southwestern Arizona, to the Huachuca Mountains in southeastern Arizona, and then into northeast Sonora, Mexico. The western end of the Maricopa thrust system has been referred to as the Maria Fold-and-Thrust Belt [75].

The Maricopa thrust tectonically separated upper plate, nonmylonitic rocks from lower plate, strongly reflective mylonitic rocks [76], as shown in the seismic section (Figure 15). Anschutz (Phillips) drilled the AZ-1 oil exploration drill hole to a total depth of 5,490 m (18,013 ft) to test this seismic feature in the early 1980s. The AZ-1 drill hole penetrated the lower plate at a depth of 3,280 m (10,761 ft), where the drill hole intersected a peraluminous granitoid that yielded a 47 Ma Rb–Sr age date. This peraluminous granite is like the Wilderness suite of granites in the Santa Catalina Mountains [48]. The AZ-1 drill hole also intersected rocks containing reduced K–Ar ages that ranged from 31 to 25.2 Ma. These age dates are like uplift-cooling ages obtained from mylonitic gneisses in the lower plate window in the Santa Catalina Mountains.

Figure 15.

Modified seismic section through AZ-1 that intersected the probable Maricopa thrust at 3,280 m (10,761 ft) and had a total depth of 5,490 m (18,013 ft), modified from [76]. The location of the cross section is shown by a northeast-trending, heavy black line on the left side of Figure 10.

The AZ-1 drill hole proved that a mylonitic lower plate containing peraluminous granites and reduced K–Ar ages is present north of the North Star fault in the northern Picacho Mountains and north of the lower plate exposure. The regional cross-sections of the Picacho Mountains and Santa Catalina Mountains (Figure 16) show mid-Laramide metaluminous mineralization in yellow and late Laramide peraluminous mineralization in blue. The regional cross-sections show the position of the upper plate and the mid-Laramide, metaluminous, porphyry copper deposit of the now-offset San Manuel (in yellow). The positions of the lower plate, peraluminous copper oxide greisen deposits, are shown in blue at Newman Peak and North Star Mine in the Picacho Mountains and at Pontatoc and Little Hill Mines in the Santa Catalina Mountains.

Cross-sections of the same areas in Figure 17 show mid-Tertiary, metaluminous, magma-sourced mineralization in purplish-pink at Mammoth near the Santa Catalina Mountains and Picacho Peak. The lower-plate-sourced chlorite breccias are shown in green in cross-sections of both mountain ranges.

Figure 16.

Cross-section of the Picacho Mountains and Santa Catalina Mountains highlighting middle Laramide, metaluminous mineralization in yellow, and Gunnison type, late Laramide, peraluminous copper-oxide greisen mineralization in blue. Original figure drawn by Stanley Keith in April 1984 and modified in 2025. Locations of cross-sections are shown on Figure 10.

Figure 17.

Cross-sections of the Picacho Mountains and Santa Catalina Mountains highlighting mid-Tertiary, metaluminous mineralization at Mammoth and Picacho Peak in purplish-pink, and lower plate-sourced, late mid-Tertiary chlorite breccias in green. Original figure drawn by Stanley Keith in April 1984 and modified in 2025. Locations of cross-sections are shown on Figure 10.

The Maricopa thrust and lower plate have been offset down an estimated 3,000 m (10,000 ft) by reverse motion on the Mogul fault in the Santa Catalina Mountains and the North Star fault in the Picacho Mountains. These faults may be segments of the same regional fault. The reverse motion and uplift are inferred to have been driven by compression related to the Galiuro orogeny in the middle Tertiary. The cross-section in Figure 17 also presents a model for the uplift of the lower plate terranes. Dehydration of the lower plate basement crystalline rocks during decompression associated with the rapid Oligocene-Miocene uplifts is inferred to have supplied metagenic, locally K-rich, hydrothermal fluids that formed the well-known chlorite breccias associated with “metamorphic core complexes.” Chlorite breccias were mistakenly explored for gold in the 1980s and 1990s and are not considered by us to be economically prospective targets for base or precious metal exploration.

Drilling, as part of the current exploration of the Casa Grande porphyry copper cluster, intersected a similar set of rocks below a feature referred to by the exploration geologists as the “basement fault” [77, 78]. The “basement fault” is the floor beneath the upper plate of antithetically tilted porphyry copper deposits (Cactus deposit, formerly Sacaton Mine, and others) and the overlying, tilted, mid-Cenozoic clastic rocks [77]. Drilling of peraluminous copper-oxide deposits in the upper plate of the northern Vulture Mountains, to the northwest in Maricopa County, also intersected a regional low-angle fault [79].

These drill penetrations into the lower plate prove that the lower plate exists as a regional, originally planar body beneath the widespread Maricopa thrust. The upper plate of the Maricopa thrust exists to the southwest and to the northeast of the lower plate windows.

The overlying upper plate is relatively undeformed and does not contain rocks exhibiting mylonitic deformation. The upper plate includes metaluminous porphyry copper deposits northeast of the lower plate windows, such as the Bagdad and Mineral Park mines in northwestern Arizona. The upper plate also includes metaluminous porphyry copper deposits southwest of the lower plate windows, such as the Ray, Pima, and Morenci mines.

Low-angle, northeast-dipping thrust faults are present in much of the belt of lower plate windows throughout southwestern, central, and southeastern Arizona. These low-angle faults dip northeastward beneath the Transition Zone and Colorado Plateau physiographic provinces and are correlated with the Maricopa thrust fault, which was intersected in the AZ-1 drill hole and imaged in various seismic lines.

In the northern Plomosa Mountains of northern La Paz County in western Arizona, the northeast-dipping Plomosa low-angle fault (Figure 2) juxtaposes lower plate Orocopia Schist beneath lower plate crystalline rocks. A large, sill-like, 9.6 km (six-mile)-long peraluminous pluton was mapped in the lower plate of the Plomosa Fault between the fault and the underlying Orocopia Schist [41, 42]. This pluton contains the Coronation peraluminous copper-oxide greisen prospect (Figure 1 and 2). Xenocrystic zircons in the Coronation pluton exhibit a very strong Orocopia Schist inheritance [41]. This inheritance strongly implies the Orocopia Schist and its metamorphosed peridotites may have been the copper source for the Coronation peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposit.

The Plomosa Fault has been imaged in a COCORP seismic reflection profile across Cactus Plain [75, 80]. The presence of Orocopia Schist in the lower plate of the Plomosa Fault requires an underthrust geotectonic model. The lower plate probably underlies the so-called “metamorphic core complexes” throughout west-central Arizona.

In effect, the Plomosa Fault is a lower structural-level analog of the Maricopa Thrust Fault. The Plomosa Fault also may merge with an analog of the Chocolate Mountain Thrust that was mapped as a high-temperature, ductile shear zone between the Coronation Pluton and Proterozoic gneisses, which are also juxtaposed next to the Orocopia Schist [75].

Lower plate windows into the Maricopa thrust contain larger areas of two-mica peraluminous crystalline rocks than the areas referred to as “metamorphic core complexes” in the literature. Mylonitic rock fabric has been considered one of the main criteria for their identification as “metamorphic core complexes.” However, mylonitic fabrics only occupy about 30% of the rocks in the lower plate windows. Mylonitic fabrics are generally absent from upper plate rocks.

In the lower plate windows, radiometric dates on the peraluminous granitoids and surrounding crystalline rocks commonly display reduced ages between 28 and 15 Ma, with K–Ar, fission track, and 40Ar/39Ar radiometric dating (Figure 18). These ages reflect rapid cooling during the uplift of the lower plate windows during the Galiuro orogeny [64].

Figure 18.

Map of lower plate windows of the Maricopa thrust in Arizona, showing uplift-cooling ages. Base map [81] with the traditional metamorphic core complexes in red, the lower plate windows in pink, and green arrows showing transport direction of the denudational faulting.

Only Eocene uplift-cooling ages occur as reduced radiometric ages on Precambrian through Laramide rocks in the Transition Zone [82], whereas both Eocene and Miocene uplift-cooling ages are represented in the northwest-trending belt of lower plate windows. Tectonic boundaries of the lower plate windows are typically marked by low-angle faults or later Basin and Range normal faults. No middle Cenozoic clastic sedimentary or volcanic rocks are in depositional contact with lower plate crystalline rocks in the lower plate windows.

The lower plate crystalline rocks contain upper greenschist to middle amphibolite metamorphic assemblages that include higher metamorphic-grade minerals, such as cordierite, sillimanite, anthophyllite, and andalusite. These higher-grade metamorphic minerals are not present in upper plate rocks. For example, sillimanite, anthophyllite, and andalusite have been reported in the contact metamorphic rock in and adjacent to the Texas Canyon pluton and the Gunnison Project peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposit.

It is economically significant that classic porphyry copper deposits do not occur in the lower plate, other than in one area where the deposit may have been subducted beneath the Maricopa thrust. In contrast, peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits with coarse muscovite appear to be exclusive to the lower plate and its tectonic margins (such as Little Hill and North Star). One occurrence at Red Hills is located a short distance into the upper plate, associated with peraluminous granite dikes. Red Hills is number 6 on Figure 10.

It is also geologically significant that no mid-Cenozoic volcanism related to the Galiuro orogeny is present in the lower plate. However, mid-Cenozoic plutons and dikes are common in the lower plate. Examples of mid-Cenozoic dikes and plutons include the Eagle Pass dike swarm in the Pinaleno Mountains, dated at about 24–26 Ma [28], and the Catalina suite plutons, dated at 26–22 Ma, in the Tortolita and Santa Catalina Mountains [44, 45, 48].

The lack of super-crustal volcanism in the lower plate is consistent with the midcrustal depth of emplacement of the peraluminous magmatism and its attendant copper-oxide greisen deposits. Significantly, volcanism of the same age as the plutons in the Santa Catalina Mountains is present in the adjacent Galiuro Mountains to the east and Tucson Mountains to the west. However, the tectonic boundary between these two crustal regimes is marked by a major low-angle fault that we infer to be reactivated denudation on the former Maricopa thrust.

6.2 Depth of emplacement and water content

Peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits formed in the middle crust at depths of about 8–16 km between approximately 72 and 43 Ma. These depths are based on geobarometry of associated peraluminous granites [45, 83]. This deep “freezing” of peraluminous magmatism in the midcrust precluded any kind of volcanic expression.

Even at depths greater than 8 km, brittle conditions could occur, probably because of high water pressures. The high water pressures are estimated to be in the range of 8–12 weight percent (wt %) in the peraluminous systems. The high water pressure produced a deep-seated hydro-fracking akin to that in the metaluminous porphyry copper systems, which formed at shallower depths between 5 and 2 km. The peraluminous plutonic suites were probably emplaced at midcrustal levels during thrust burial and crustal thickening induced by tectonics related to the Maricopa thrust.

Water exsolution from the Wilderness Sill Complex and other plutons, such as the Texas Canyon Granite, is associated with the formation of deep, peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits. These deposits are associated with differentiated leucogranite phases near the tops of the plutons, especially the sills. Examples include the Pontatoc, Pusch Ridge, and Mt. Lemmon mineral districts in the Santa Catalina Mountains [15] and the Coronation mineral district in the northern Plomosa Mountains [1]. Additionally, the Carlota, Warrior, and Live Oak deposits occur near the top of the granite porphyry (G porphyry phase) [10] of the Schultze Granite in the Globe-Miami area.

Much of the tectonic burial preceded the emplacement of the main stage of batholiths of the Wilderness assemblage. In the Santa Catalina Mountains, tectonic burial occurred between approximately 67 and 57 Ma. Mylonitization at the top of the Wilderness suite batholith was achieved at a shallower level, at about 9 km depth, based on the muscovite-biotite-alkali feldspar-quartz barometer and the phengitic muscovite barometer [83]. Hence, south- and southwest-directed mylonitization near the top of the Wilderness sill complex occurred beneath an upper plate that was approximately 9 km thick in middle Eocene time, at about 50 Ma.

Thrust burial reached its maximum during flat subduction in the Eocene [11] and is now widely recognized in the literature. Rapid uplift of the lower plate windows began about 38 Ma. Rapid uplifts occurred in the cores of broad anticlinal uplifts that were formed under the influence of regional compression during the mid-Tertiary [64].

After about 30 Ma, rapid uplift took place during the westward migration of the mid-Cenozoic volcanic arc complex through the Tucson region during the Galiuro orogeny. The tectonic burial model satisfies all of the geobarometric constraints, which, in other narratives, have problematic aspects, especially the widely used crustal extension model.

Figure 19 shows the model of thrust burial and subsequent uplift and denudation superimposed on geobarometry [83]. The figure also shows the suggested shallower geobarometry (4–2 km) for the Marble Peak skarn and the Rice Peak epizonal pluton in the Santa Catalina Mountains [84].

Figure 19.

Geobarometry for Leatherwood (Middle Laramide), Wilderness (Latest Laramide), and Catalina (Galiuro-Mid-Cenozoic) suite plutons. The left shows the pressure-temperature fields of the three plutonic suites and right panel shows the depth of the same plutons with age. Modified after [83].

Between the anticlinal uplifts, synclinal troughs formed that were filled with coarse clastic sedimentary rocks and volcanics, such as the Galiuro Volcanics. The Galiuro Volcanics are a metaluminous, alkali-calcic, trachyandesite to high-silica rhyolitic ignimbrite field, aged from 28 to 22 Ma, in the type area of the Galiuro orogeny [61]. The Galiuro Volcanic Field is in the Galiuro Mountains, between the San Pedro Valley northeast of the Santa Catalina Mountains and the Pinaleno Mountains, as shown in Figure 18.

Uplifts were also, in part, triggered by thermalism introduced by the return of a hot asthenosphere wedge to an area of delaminated crustal lithosphere. The thermalism produced a softening of the crust that enhanced the compression and uplift effects. The regional uplifts were accompanied by major gravity-driven denudational faulting, which is widely referred to in the literature as extensional “detachment faulting.” In most cases, these denudational reactivations are associated with renewed faulting on the former Maricopa thrust system.

6.3 Laramide age of emplacement

Peraluminous copper-oxide deposits were formed in the latest part of the Laramide orogeny after the deposition of the classic porphyry copper deposits. In terms of relative ages, the latest Laramide-aged peraluminous granitoids typically intrude older metaluminous quartz diorites to granodiorites that are associated with porphyry copper mineralization. One example is the two-mica Wilderness Granite, which intruded the metaluminous Leatherwood suite in the Santa Catalina Mountains at the Marble Peak copper skarn deposit [48]. Another example is the Sierrita peraluminous granite and related pegmatites, which intruded the Ruby Star granodiorite associated with the Pima district porphyry copper cluster in the Sierrita Mountains of Pima County [10]. Additionally, in the Grayback area of the northern Tortilla Mountains, the Ninetysix Hills plutons consist of an early metaluminous phase intruded by later peraluminous phases [28, 30, 32].

In terms of absolute ages, abundant radiometric data clearly show a mid- to late Laramide age of emplacement of the peraluminous plutons (Table 1 and 2). One of the best radiometrically dated examples is the Texas Canyon pluton, which has U–Pb dating of zircons at about 58–56 Ma on the Stage 3 biotite quartz monzonite phase [50, 52]. The main phase of the Texas Canyon pluton is cut by a suite of biotite aplites that display an intimate association with the Gunnison copper-oxide greisen deposits [9]. The Stage 4 Adams Peak leucogranite and related muscovite-garnet aplite dikes and greisens yielded a 54.6 ± 0.2 Ma whole-rock Rb–Sr isochron [53].

Additional radiometric dating of the peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits includes:

  • The 68 Ma U–Pb date for the Little Hill pluton [22],

  • The 69 Ma age for the Signal Peak Granite in the Sacaton Peak complex [85],

  • The 59 Ma age for the Newman Peak Member of the peraluminous granite complex in the southern Picacho Mountains [24],

  • The U–Pb geochronology for the Wilderness Suite in the Santa Catalina Mountains, with numerous U–Pb dates between 38 and 58 Ma [44, 45, 47], and

  • The Relleno peraluminous granitoid suite in the Pinaleno Mountains, with similar ages [86].

On a regional basis, the transition from upper crustal, conventional porphyry copper deposit formation (Morenci assemblage) to midcrustal peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposit formation (Wilderness assemblage) is time-transgressive from west to east [11]. In eastern California and western Arizona, Wilderness-type peraluminous calc-alkalic plutons are about 73–71 Ma, based on U–Pb dating of rocks in the Old Woman Mountains, and are 76–65 Ma in the northern Plomosa Mountains [41], and 70 Ma in northwestern Arizona in the Cyclopic-Garnet Range area [87]. In southeastern Arizona, Wilderness suite plutons are 53–38 Ma in the Santa Catalina Mountains and 55 Ma as the Relleno suite in the Pinaleno Mountains [86].

6.4 Magmatic water and volcanism

The peraluminous petrology of the Texas Canyon pluton strongly implies a crustal anatectic origin related to a “water flooding” event. The water flooding could have occurred during the flat subduction event that affected southern Arizona between approximately 62 and 43 Ma. The flooding of large amounts of water could have been produced by dehydration of the deep crust, especially by dehydration of underthrust Franciscan metagraywacke and serpentinite. During the Paleocene-Eocene, regional isostatic uplift was enhanced by additional buoyancy produced by tectonic coupling of the northeasterly flatly subducting Farallon plate with the relatively southwest-moving North American upper plate.

Magmatic water can be emplaced along a spectrum that ranges from midcrustal, nonvolcanic fluid releases to uppermost crustal, dry volcanism. The midcrustal fluid releases are associated with peraluminous greisenous metallogeny (such as copper, tin, tungsten, and beryllium). These peraluminous fluid releases are associated with very hydrous magmatism that is not linked to volcanism.

At upper crustal levels, between 2 and 5 km depths, less hydrous plutons are typically metaluminous in character and are associated with metal-bearing, hornblende-bearing magmatism. These plutons produce nongreisenous, more epigenetic base and precious metal deposits. Above 2 km, epithermal metallogeny typically features precious metals and occurs with widespread volcanism that contains hornblende. However, near-surface volcanism that lacks hornblende is typically not associated with robust metallogeny, except for the more vapor-phase volcanism that features mercury.

The midcrustal emplacement depth of peraluminous magmatism is consistent with classic experimental data relating to the water content of pegmatitic granitic igneous rocks [88]. From Burnham’s experimental data, water exsolves from pegmatitic granitic rocks at 8–12 wt% water at a depth of 12–18 km. This experimental data aligns with empirical geobarometry data for the Santa Catalina Mountains [45, 83]. When water exsolves from magma, and temperature and pressure cross the solidus, the magma quickly freezes at midcrustal levels and does not produce volcanism.

In Arizona and other locations, an Eocene “magmatic gap” was based on K–Ar dating of mostly metaluminous plutons and volcanics. However, extensive U–Pb dating has now established that this “magmatic gap” is populated by abundant peraluminous plutonism, but not volcanism. Hence, the term “magmatic gap” should be renamed the “volcanic gap.”

In the classic stratovolcano porphyry copper model [89], conventional porphyry copper deposits are shown to have formed beneath andesitic stratovolcanoes. However, most Arizona porphyry copper deposits are not associated with time-equivalent volcanics. When volcanics are present in the same area, dating of the volcanism yields ages that are typically 8–15 million years older than the mineralization of the porphyry copper deposits.

The porphyry copper intrusive sequences typically contain hornblende. Experimental work [90] showed that hornblende-stable granodiorites, similar to those associated with porphyry copper deposits, require about 4 wt% water, which exsolves from the magma at depths of 5–2 km. This exsolution takes place below the interface between the volcanism and the underlying plutons to produce porphyritic rocks but does not reach the surface to produce extensive volcanism.

In Arizona, the only time-equivalent volcanism that spatially coexists with a porphyry copper system occurs at Copper Creek in Pinal County, where U–Pb dating has shown a time equivalency between the Glory Hole Volcanics and porphyry copper-related granodiorites at Copper Creek [91]. Although copper has been produced from breccia pipes at Copper Creek, at least 100 years of persistent and thorough exploration have not yielded a commercial porphyry copper deposit. The lack of a robust porphyry copper system may have resulted from the Copper Creek granodiorite being too dry to produce a good stockwork effect [91]. In effect, an association with time-equivalent volcanism may be a negative indicator in the exploration for metaluminous porphyry copper deposits.

Where there is a spatial correspondence between volcanism and metaluminous porphyry copper deposits, there is usually an age discrepancy of 5–10 million years between the volcanism and the quartz diorite to granodiorite plutons associated with the porphyry copper deposits. For example, at the Christmas deposit, the Stage 3 biotite granodiorite of the Christmas stock yields U–Pb dates of about 63 Ma [92] and is associated with extensive skarn metallization as well as a large, low-grade copper deposit hosted in the trachyandesitic Williamson Canyon Volcanics. However, the Williamson Canyon Volcanics have been dated at 74–82 Ma [93]. In addition, the Williamson Canyon Volcanics are more alkaline in character and are classified as metaluminous, alkali-calcic, in contrast to metaluminous, calc-alkalic for intrusions associated with the Christmas porphyry copper deposit. Similar age and geochemical discordances exist for volcanism at the Ajo, Silver Bell, Patagonia, and Safford porphyry copper deposits.

Additionally, plutons that are time-equivalent with alkali-calcic volcanism are associated with lead-zinc-silver systems, not porphyry copper systems. Examples of mineralization related to time-equivalent alkali-calcic volcanism and plutonism are:

  • The Empire lead-zinc-silver deposits are associated with the Sycamore Canyon stock and Salero Volcanics;

  • The Tombstone lead-zinc-silver deposits are associated with the Schieffelin quartz monzonite stock and the time-equivalent Uncle Sam quartz latite volcanics;

  • The Charleston lead-zinc-silver districts and associated stocks and Bronco Volcanics;

  • The Cerro Colorado lead-zinc-silver vein system associated with time-equivalent dikes and Cerro Colorado volcanics [91]; and

  • The quartz monzonite stocks at Washington Camp-Duquesne in the Patagonia area, along with age-equivalent rhyolitic volcanics at Red Mountain and trachyandesite of Meadow Valley, are associated with the Flux lead-zinc-silver mine [94].

The above lead-zinc-silver examples were grouped into the Tombstone assemblage [11]. The mineral deposits of the Tombstone assemblage have yielded moderate lead-zinc-silver production, whereas the various porphyry copper deposits have yielded world-class copper and molybdenum production. The contrast in type and volume of metal production could be related to the water content of the associated magmatism. Tombstone assemblage lead-zinc-silver-related magmatism was less hydrous and more volcanic-related, whereas the Morenci assemblage copper-molybdenum-related magmatism was more hydrous and lacked significant volcanism [11].

The correlation of low water content and volcanism can be extended into the epithermal class of mineral deposits, such as the Comstock Lode deposits in Nevada and the Oatman epithermal vein complex in western Arizona. These districts, and numerous others, are associated with hornblende-bearing andesitic volcanism and biotitic felsic volcanism. Epizonal, hornblende dioritic to quartz-feldspar porphyry intrusions are associated with productive epithermal, mainly precious metal districts. For example, the Mount Davidson hornblende quartz diorite in the Comstock area of Nevada may be the causative intrusion for the Comstock Lode complex, all of which have been emplaced in mid- to late Miocene andesitic volcanics.

Dryer volcanism that lacks hornblende but contains ferromagnesium mineral suites, such as pyroxene and olivine, typically lacks significant epithermal metallogeny. The Bohemia district in Oregon may be an example of a dry to weakly hydrous epithermal mineral system. However, these drier systems may be associated with vapor-phase mercury districts, such as the California Coastal Range mercury belt of mid- to late Miocene age.

The completely dry, bimodal (typically basalt-rhyolite) volcanism of the late Miocene in the Basin and Range province represents an end member of the continuum from midcrustal, nonvolcanic fluid releases to uppermost crustal, dry volcanism. This upper crustal volcanism may be associated with local fumarolic systems that lack any significant base or precious metal metallogeny. For example, this type of magmatism appeared on a regional basis throughout Arizona in the late Miocene during the San Andreas orogeny [64].

6.5 Plate tectonic setting

Between the middle and latest phases of the Laramide orogeny, the plate tectonic setting vastly changed from normal-dip, flattening subduction to very flat subduction [9597]. Flat subduction was associated with continent-scale underthrusting of the Franciscan mélange wedge as far east as the Four Corners region [98]. At Buell Park on the Apache County, Arizona-New Mexico border, the Franciscan mélange wedge appears as exotic nodules of blue-schist eclogite in serpentinite diapirs. Underthrusting may have reached as far east as the present Mississippi River, which is the eastern boundary of the Great Plains uplift, based on gravity data [99] and crustal thickness data [100].

Subduction of the Franciscan mélange wedge produced massive amounts of dehydration. This dehydration created a “water flood” that rose into the North American upper plate to produce a distinctive suite of peraluminous granitoids, referred to as the Wilderness Suite [48]. The concept of the muscovite-bearing, peraluminous plutons was extended regionally throughout the western USA [101]. The concept of a western North American peraluminous belt was extended to a Cordilleran-wide zone referred to as the Cordilleran anatectic granite belt [51].

From a plate tectonic perspective, peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits occur as a late-stage product of flat subduction. During flat subduction in the culminant or latest part of the Laramide orogeny, peraluminous magmatism was produced in very large volumes (Figure 20) by hydrous melting of various kinds of preexisting Precambrian crust. Based on inherited zircon ages extracted from Laramide peraluminous plutons in the Santa Catalina Mountains [44, 47] and elsewhere [50], commonly inherited zircon sources are granites of the Picuris (~1,400 Ma), Mazatzal (~1,600 Ma), and Yavapai (~1,700 Ma) orogenies.

Figure 20.

Paleoconvergence rate in cm/year versus time in Ma, showing the plate tectonic context of Stage 3 peraluminous magmatism associated with copper-oxide deposits and Stage 4 peraluminous magmatism associated with tungsten deposits (blue box) compared to Stages 2.5 to 3, metaluminous calc-alkalic magmatism associated with porphyry copper deposits (yellow box), and metaluminous alkali-calcic magmatism associated with lead-zinc-silver deposits (orange box). Numbers in parentheses are stages. Data from [97, 102104].

Plate tectonic convergence rates during the emplacement of the peraluminous plutons in the latest Laramide are estimated to have been up to 40 cm/yr [96]. These very high speeds allowed maximum dehydration of the underthrusting oceanic lithosphere, which was likely composed of Franciscan metagraywacke and serpentinized peridotite.

The flat subduction of lower-density metagraywackes and serpentinite (and the attachment of these lower-density rocks to the base of the continent) decreased the overall density of the overlying North American plate. The overall crustal profile thus became more buoyant and allowed a continental-scale epeiric uplift of western North America. This uplift resulted in the formation of the regional Eocene erosional surface and altiplano across the Great Basin and Basin and Range provinces [20, 50, 105].

Peraluminous rocks also have a lower density than metaluminous rocks, which could have contributed to the lower density of the lithosphere overlying the flatly subducting crust. The tectonic thinning has been referred to as “decretion” [106, 107] and more recently as “Laramide lithospheric bull-dozing” [82]. The Altiplano later transtensionally collapsed during the late Miocene creation of the San Andreas Fault margin and its associated San Andreas orogeny [64].

The paleo-convergence rate of the middle Laramide, metaluminous, calc-alkalic, porphyry copper-related plutons was up to 24 cm/yr with a paleo dip of 9° [96]. The low-angle dip and high convergence rate near the end of the middle part of the Laramide orogeny could have contributed to the extremely large size of the metaluminous, calc-alkalic, porphyry copper system at the Morenci mine. Morenci also has the largest Stage 3 biotite granodiorite plutons, which may suggest that the increasingly flat subduction was an important factor in creating the supergiant size of Morenci [5].

7. Comparison with classic metaluminous porphyry copper deposits

The geology of peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits (blue stars in Figure 11) markedly contrasts with the geology of conventional porphyry copper deposits (yellow stars in Figure 11). Classic porphyry copper deposits are described from a magma-metals point of view in several publications [1, 5, 7, 8] and from a more conventional point of view [72].

Classic porphyry copper deposits are associated with more mafic, metaluminous magma-metal series that contain hornblende. However, the metaluminous plutons did not have enough mass to produce the large-scale melting of the crust that occurred during the later flat subduction event in the latest part of the Laramide orogeny. In classic porphyry copper deposits in the metaluminous rock sequences, the major mineralogy consists of pyroxene and olivine in early gabbroic to dioritic stages. During hydration in the midcrust, these early mafic minerals may have been replaced by hornblende and/or biotite [8]. Conventional porphyry copper deposits in Arizona (Morenci assemblage) formed in the upper crust at depths of about 2–5 km during the middle Laramide orogeny (71–53 Ma).

The disappearance of hornblende coincides with a hydrothermal fluid release. Hornblende disappearance in plutonic differentiates related to porphyry copper deposits is an important trigger for the expulsion of incompatible-water and attendant incompatible metals and other elements. Hornblende is a “water-hog,” requiring at least 4 wt% water to be stable [90]. When hornblende disappears due to calcium depletion, there are not enough magnesium minerals to take up the excess water. Thus, excess water exsolves from typically biotite-hornblende granodiorite as a biotite fractionation event associated with the release of metal-rich, hypersaline fluids.

Depending on what other metals may be acting incompatibly as a function of the overall bulk magma chemistry, the incompatible water component can contain various metal assemblages. Serial magmatic sequences that produce classic porphyry copper deposits (Morenci assemblage) are classified as metaluminous, calc-alkalic, hydrous (hornblende-bearing), oxidized (magnetite-sphene-bearing), and normal halogen magma series [7]. In this metaluminous, calc-alkalic magma metal series, incompatible elements include copper and molybdenum, which are partitioned into the exsolving, incompatible water component.

In contrast, in metaluminous, alkali-calcic, magma-metal series deposits (Tombstone assemblage) that have a more alkaline magmatic chemistry (Figure 4), incompatible elements, including lead and zinc, are partitioned into the exsolving incompatible water component. Both oxidized, calc-alkalic, and alkali-calcic magma-metal series deposits appear to partition silver into the incompatible water component [108].

The classic porphyry copper deposits were emplaced about 5–10 million years earlier (between 75 and 55 Ma) than peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits in any given area in Arizona. For example, in the Globe-Miami and Pima mineral districts, classic porphyry copper deposits formed at about 68–63 Ma [10], whereas the peraluminous copper-oxide deposits formed at about 62–55 Ma.

Porphyry copper suites are older in western and northwestern Arizona and are younger in eastern Arizona. Examples of the eastward transgression of emplacement ages [72] include the following.

  • Western Arizona porphyry copper deposits range from 78 to 66 Ma at Mineral Park (75–70 Ma), Bagdad (78–70 Ma), and Ajo (66 Ma).

  • South-central Arizona porphyry copper deposits range from 72 to 63 Ma in the Globe-Miami-Ray-Christmas areas.

  • Southeastern Arizona porphyry copper deposits are associated with the Patagonia Batholith of Santa Cruz County (68–64 Ma) and with the Pima District in the Sierrita Mountains of Pima County (62–58 Ma).

  • Farther east in eastern Arizona, the porphyry copper clusters in Graham-Greenlee counties range from 57–54 Ma at the Safford area and from 55–54 Ma at the Morenci area.

  • In New Mexico, porphyry copper deposits were emplaced at Tyrone and in the Santa Rita area at about 55 Ma.

The youngest metaluminous calc-alkalic deposit, at 55 Ma, is also the largest porphyry copper deposit in Arizona, with 47.72 million metric tons [72]. The K57.5 index for the Morenci plutonic suite indicates that it has the lowest potassium content among the Laramide porphyry copper deposits [96, 97].

In classic Arizona porphyry copper deposits, a typical sequence of serial differentiation of the magmatic suite consists of hornblende quartz diorite (Stage 2), hornblende biotite granodiorite (Stage 2.5), biotite granodiorite (Stage 3), and quartz feldspar porphyries (Stage 4) [15]. Pegmatites and aplites are of minor importance [5]. Monazite and spessartine garnet are conspicuous by their absence.

Isotopic contamination is relatively minor in classic porphyry copper deposits. For example, initial strontium ratios are between 0.705 and 0.709. Zircons are generally relatively uncontaminated, especially those emplaced into the upper plate of the Maricopa thrust system.

Metaluminous hydrothermal fractionates of plutons associated with classic porphyry copper deposits release much more sulfur than peraluminous granitoids associated with copper-oxide greisen deposits. In classic porphyry copper systems, sulfur is sequestered in pyrite and chalcopyrite during the main stage of copper mineralization associated with the Stage 3 copper release. In Stage 4, the sulfur is sequestered in chalcopyrite-bornite. Stage 3 hydrothermalism is magnetite-destructive and commonly results in strong magnetic lows associated with potassic and phyllic alteration. The Stage 4 fluid release features much more arsenic and less sulfur, which results in arsenical sulfosalts, such as enargite. Specularite and magnetite are also present in Stage 4 deposits, along with pyrite.

Typical potassic alteration in porphyry copper deposits is characterized by early secondary biotite-orthoclase (K-feldspar), with or without anhydrite. The potassic alteration transitions into a later, lower pH quartz-sericite phyllic assemblage. Chalcopyrite and molybdenite bridge the gap between potassic and phyllic alteration assemblages. These two assemblages are characterized by Stage 3 biotite granodiorite plutons, and both are derived from the fractionation of Stage 2.5 hornblende-biotite granodiorite.

Final emplacement of conventional porphyry copper deposits was immediately followed by a major crustal thickening episode related to the development of the Maricopa thrust system and synkinematic intrusion of the peraluminous granites. Initial crustal thickening may have already been occurring in the lower crust during the emplacement of the upper plate, metaluminous porphyry copper systems [50].

8. Copper source

The source of copper is a continuing debate in discussions on the origin of conventional porphyry copper deposits. Some researchers consider the source of copper to be the crust, while others consider the source of copper to be the mantle. Both concepts are reasonable, but they apply at different times and at different crustal depths of origin. The crust may be the source of copper in peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits, whereas the mantle may be the source of copper in the earlier, conventional porphyry copper deposits.

8.1 Mantle source of metaluminous porphyry copper deposits

The earlier, classic porphyry copper deposits are associated with moderately dipping subduction (Figure 21) that hydrously melted metaluminous mafic sources in the upper mantle above the subducting Farallon slab [96]. The specific source for porphyry copper deposits may have been a high-alumina eclogite layer in the upper asthenosphere between depths of approximately 130 and 240 km [8]. This depth is based on the application of the potassium-depth (K–h) index (K2O content at 57.5% SiO2) determined from K2O-SiO2 Harker variation plots [96, 109, 110]. Confidence in the mafic metaluminous source is based on a world-wide empirical correlation between metaluminous calc-alkalic magmatism and porphyry copper deposits [6, 8, 96, 111].

Figure 21.

Diagram of layered mantle source of metaluminous mineral deposits.

Water contents were estimated to be 4–8 wt% water in the field of hornblende stability [96]. Hydrous melting produced significant volumes of gabbroic magmatism, which fractionated in the upper crust into stages of increasingly more felsic plutonic differentiates. Both calc-alkalic copper-molybdenum porphyry deposits and alkali-calcic lead-zinc-silver deposits are associated with Stage 3 biotite granodiorite and biotite quartz monzonite plutons.

Within metaluminous calc-alkalic, hornblende-bearing, oxidized differentiation sequences, conventional porphyry copper deposits are associated with Stage 3 biotite granodiorite systems. Both the copper and the Stage 3 biotite granodiorites are derived from a biotite-hornblende Stage 2.5 precursor. Additionally, the later Stage 4 quartz-feldspar porphyritic granite rock systems are associated with arsenical copper deposits, mainly as veins with fringing copper-lead-zinc-silver deposits and more distal manganese-silver deposits [11].

Inherited zircon xenocrysts in metaluminous rocks are much less common in igneous rocks associated with metaluminous porphyry copper deposits than in peraluminous igneous rocks. In peraluminous rocks, zircon cores commonly display evidence of hydrous supercritical fluids causing metamictization, which is the process of structural breakdown caused by accumulated radiation damage from the radioactive decay of trace amounts of uranium and thorium within the crystal structure. The supercritical fluids reflect the addition of crustal fluids that altered existing early zircon cores and produced hydrous ferromagnesian reaction products. Examples include hornblende and biotite mantles surrounding pyroxene and olivine (less commonly) cores.

However, the supercritical fluids did not melt the diorites or gabbros that contained the original zircons. Rather, the original gabbros were derived by hydrous melting of the high-alumina eclogite in the asthenosphere of the hanging wall immediately overlying the descending oceanic slab. Hence, the inherited metaluminous zircon mineralogy probably reflects igneous formation in the high-alumina, Stage 1, gabbroic sources.

8.2 Crustal source of peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits

The source of copper for peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits relates to the chemistry of the associated peraluminous plutons. Compared to metaluminous plutons, peraluminous plutons are more aluminum-rich and silica-rich, as shown in the A/CNK versus SiO2 variation diagrams (Figure 3).

Peraluminous plutons were formed by hydrous “water flooding” of the lower to mid-crust during flat subduction and decretion (lower crustal erosion) [74] in the latest part of the Laramide Orogeny (Figure 22).

Figure 22.

Diagram of latest Laramide, flatly dipping, subducting plate under Arizona crust and the metallic ore deposits that resulted from peraluminous magmas formed by crustal melting of different types of crust. Modified from [6].

Peraluminous sources are almost certainly crustal in origin, as peraluminous magmas were generated by hydrous melting of granodioritic to granitic or metasedimentary sources. Peraluminous plutons acquired their copper from minimum melt, sialic, plutonic to metasedimentary sources in the lower to middle crust. Melting occurred under middle to upper amphibolite-grade metamorphic conditions. In some cases, such as at the Coronation prospect in La Paz County [1], underthrust metagraywacke sources (such as the Orocopia Schist) were anatectically melted under very hydrous conditions, in the presence of fluids derived from the flatly subducting slab.

A major clue to answering the source question is present in the morphology and geochemistry of zircons in igneous rocks in both peraluminous and metaluminous magma-metal series classes. Zircons in peraluminous igneous rocks have cores of inherited zircons with younger rims and/or tip overgrowths that reflect the age of emplacement (Figure 23). The inherited zircon component is commonly overgrown by hydrothermal zircon and, in some cases, by later magmatic zircons.

Figure 23.

Photographs of zircon morphology and age dates showing the transition from detrital (Panel A) to hydrothermal metamorphic (Panels B, C, D, and E) to magmatic zircons (Panels F and G) extracted from the Coronation Pluton of La Paz County, Arizona. Modified from [41].

Igneous peraluminous zircons were formed in the crust under mid- to upper-amphibolite melt conditions. However, inherited zircons represent survivors of various crustal sources that may have contributed copper to the various bulk peraluminous melts.

Xenocrystic zircon data from the Texas Canyon pluton indicate the pluton acquired zircons from Precambrian Johnny Lyon granodiorite (~1,655 Ma), possibly Pinal Schist (~1,650 Ma), and minor Precambrian diabase sources (~1,100 Ma). Similar xenocrystic zircons occur in the lower plates throughout southeastern Arizona. The xenocrystic zircons may reflect assimilation by melting of the above crustal sources, which could have contributed copper to the peraluminous magma.

Very strong evidence for the Orocopia Schist as a source of the Coronation peraluminous pluton in the northern Plomosa Mountains is present in its zircons (Figure 23). A complete sequence of zircon morphology is documented in the Coronation pluton [41]. The zircon morphological sequence progresses from initial detrital zircons through hydrothermal metamorphism to initial magmatic zircons and finally to fully magmatic zircons (G panel in Figure 23). The Coronation peraluminous granite is genetically related to the Coronation copper-gold peraluminous district of the northern Plomosa Mountains [1].

The zircon morphological sequence in the Coronation Pluton consists of the following types:

  1. Detrital. Rounded fragments with original internal textures, including oscillatory growth zoning, no alteration rims, and high Th/U ratios (> 0.1).

  2. Initial hydrothermal metamorphic. Bright luminescence indicating high U/Th ratios (>10), with corrosion rims containing original internal textures and older detrital ages associated with high Th/U (>0.1). Not shown are the ages of the rims, which are the age of metamorphism (68–50 Ma).

  3. Advanced hydrothermal metamorphic. Thicker oscillatory overgrowths with very high U/Th ratios (>10) on bright rims with intermediate ages, destruction of the original core replaced by chaotic mottling, dark opacity induced by metamictization, and original ages of the detrital grain still preserved in cores.

  4. Advanced hydrothermal metamorphic. Complete metamictization of cores exhibiting strong, chaotic, mottled textures with intermediate ages in overgrown rims, which reflect incipient melting.

  5. Incipient magmatic. Thicker oscillatory overgrowths with high U/Th ratios (>10), exhibiting magmatic formation ages, while the original ages of detrital grains remain preserved in metamict cores. Oscillatory growth zones reflect growth under anhydrous conditions, where the supercritical water responsible for metamictization is transferred to late hydrous mica crystallization.

  6. Incomplete magmatic. The entire grain contains magmatic formation ages, including cores that display relict metamict texture with high U/Th ratios (>10).

  7. Complete magmatic. The entire grain exhibits hydrothermal growth zone texture and magmatic formation ages. These grains are inferred to have grown under entirely magmatic conditions, where the water component was distributed into the later, lower-temperature, hydrous mica component. The ages of these grains best reflect the crystallization age of the peraluminous magma.

Zircons from peraluminous plutons contain true inherited xenocrysts (Panel A of Figure 23). The case history of the sequence of inherited to magmatic zircons from the Orocopia Schist to the Coronation pluton provides proof of a crustal source for the Coronation peraluminous pluton. The zircon data show that the NIC unit (here called the Coronation pluton) was a probable melt product of the Orocopia Schist, based on age histograms for the detrital zircon population [41].

Similar zircon inheritances are now well-documented in the Santa Catalina Mountains [44, 47]. The Wilderness Sill Complex is associated with hematitic copper-oxide deposits at Mount Lemmon, the Pontatoc Mine area, and the westernmost Pusch Ridge. Detrital and metamorphic zircons in the Wilderness Sill Complex show abundant 1,440 Ma age dates, which indicate major assimilation of an Oracle Granite source, and show lesser amounts of 1,640 Ma age dates, which indicate a lesser assimilation of Johnny Lyon Granodiorite. These sources are believed to be good candidates for the ultimate source of the copper. The copper was then distilled by fractionation in the Wilderness Sill Complex due to progressive biotite disappearance.

Inherited zircons in the Globe-Miami area indicate that Mazatzal-age sources, specifically the 1,630 Ma Madera Diorite, may have been a melt source for the Solitude Granite, the G Porphyry phase of the Schultze Granite [10], and the Manitou Granite. These igneous bodies may then have fractionated to produce the Carlota, Live Oak-Warrior, and Van Dyke peraluminous copper-oxide deposits.

Cathodoluminescence characteristics of zircons in peraluminous rocks are much brighter on an overall basis compared to zircons in metaluminous rocks. The cathodoluminescence is probably due to the much higher uranium and thorium contents of peraluminous zircons compared to metaluminous zircons.

9. Conclusions

An exploration guide to peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits is presented in Table 5. This summary compares the peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits in the far-right column with metaluminous, calc-alkalic, porphyry copper deposits in the center column, and metaluminous, alkali-calcic, lead-zinc-silver deposits in the left-of-center column.

Characteristic “Barren for Cu” deposits (Metaluminous Alkali-calcic) MAC Classic porphyry copper deposits (metaluminous calc-alkalic) MCA Copper-oxide greisen deposits (peraluminous calc-alkalic) PCA
Ore minerals Galena, sphalerite, tetrahedrite, zinc, minor chalcopyrite, bornite, and minor stibnite Chalcopyrite, molybdenite, bornite, pyrite, tennantite, and enargite Chrysocolla (primary), specular hematite, and minor minerals (pyrite, chalcopyrite, molybdenite, bornite, goshenite beryl, and hübnerite)
Secondary enrichment Cerussite, anglesite, massicot, jarosite, hematite, Mn oxides, hemimorphite, and goethite Chalcocite, azurite, malachite, chrysocolla, native copper, and alunite Red, earthy hematite, with none to minor chalcocite.
Primary alteration Phyllic (sericite-pyrite), fluorite Potassic (K-feldspar-quartz-secondary biotite), phyllic (fine-grained muscovite/sericite, pyrite), and alunite Kaolinite, minor (powellite, late coarse muscovite greisen, fluorite, early quartz-orthoclase, specular hematite/magnetite)
Water content of associated igneous rocks Lower H2O (4–5 wt %),hornblende stable, hydrous Moderate H2O (4–7 wt %),hornblende stable, hydrous Very high H2O (8–15 wt%).muscovite stable, hydrous
Commodities Pb–Zn–Ag (minor Cu–Au–Mn) Cu–Mo–Ag (minor Au–Pb–Zn–Mn) Chrysocolla, “Oxide” Cu
Igneous rock association Metaluminous pyroxene-hornblende-biotite monzodiorite, biotite quartz monzonite, differentiating to alkali granite Metaluminous hornblende-bearing granodiorite differentiating to biotite-granodiorite and late quartz-feldspar porphyry Peraluminous biotite granodiorite differentiating to almandine-spessartine garnet-bearing aplo-pegmatites and two-mica granites
Magma-metal class metaluminous, alkali-calcic metaluminous, calc-alkalic peraluminous, calc-alkalic
Aluminum content of associated igneous rock (molecular A/CNK Ratio) 0.4–1.1 0.4–1.1 0.95–1.4
Alkalinity of associated igneous rocks(K2O% at 57.5% SiO2) 2.45–3.8Alkali-calcic 1.1. – 2.45Calc-alkalic K57.5 index is not applicable, as all plutons are > 65% SiO2. Sr ppm content at 1.25% CaO is 350 to 200 ppm
Water content (iron content) Iron-poor (hydrous on AFM ternary diagram), hornblende-bearing) Iron-poor (hydrous on AFM ternary diagram), hornblende-bearing) Iron-poor (hydrous on AFM ternary diagram), muscovite-bearing
Oxidation state of associated igneous rock Weakly oxidized (ilmenite-magnetite-stable) to oxidized (magnetite-sphene-stable) Weakly oxidized (ilmenite-magnetite stable) to oxidized (magnetite-sphene stable) Weakly oxidized (ilmenite-hematite to hematite-stable) to oxidized (hematite-stable)
Regional tectonics In the upper plate of the Maricopa thrust fault In the upper plate of the Maricopa thrust fault In the lower plate of the Maricopa thrust fault
Plate tectonic context Initial steepening subduction Faster steepening subduction Very fast flat subduction
Western Arizonaexamples and ages of mineralization or of associated igneous rock. Diamond Joe (72–76 Ma) Bagdad (73 Ma)Mineral Park (73 Ma) Vulture Cu–Ox (~69 Ma)Coronation (69–65 Ma)
South-central Arizonaexamples and ages of mineralization Santa Rita Mts. (~71-63 Ma);Sycamore Canyon (Empire District) (73 Ma) Globe-Miami (65 Ma); Ray (64 Ma); Resolution (66–64 Ma); Pima (65 Ma); Silverbell (64 Ma) Carlota (62 Ma)Sierrita pegmatites (60 Ma)
Eastern Arizonaexamples and ages of mineralization Tombstone (74 Ma) Morenci (53–55 Ma)Safford (58 Ma) Texas Canyon (Gunnison) (58–54 Ma)Pinaleno Mts. (Relleno granites) (55 Ma)
Zircon morphology Common magmatic zircons; rare zircons with metamict cores of older ages (mottled texture) Common magmatic zircons; rare zircons with metamict cores of older ages (mottled texture) Common complete zircon xenocrysts (completely from the older precursor with no overgrowths), some zircons with younger overgrowths, and some complete magmatic zircons
Volcanism Common None or very rare None
Convergence rate 7–10 cm/yr 9–25 cm/yr 14–42 cm/yr
Emplacement Depth 0–3 km 2–5 km 8–16 km

Table 5.

Exploration guide to Arizona peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits, classic porphyry copper, and lead-zinc-silver deposits. Age dates are from [10, 21, 41, 42, 67, 72, 91, 112].

Chrysocolla is the main ore mineral and represents the primary economic opportunity of the peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits. Extraction technology will likely involve some form of copper leach processing technologies currently being applied at the Gunnison Copper project in southeastern Arizona [16].

Peraluminous copper-oxide deposits are found in lower plate crystalline complexes that contain peraluminous plutonic rocks. Peraluminous plutons constitute the main rock type in the lower plate and are genetically linked to crustal thickening induced by the Maricopa thrust fault. Peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits are found in or near windows into midcrustal (8–20 km depths), lower plate crystalline complexes in Arizona.

Zircon mineralogy reflects a crustal source for magmas in the case of peraluminous copper-oxide deposits and reflects a mantle source in the case of metaluminous calc-alkalic magma series of conventional porphyry copper deposits. No metaluminous, classic porphyry copper deposits (other than the subducted skarn deposits at Marble Peak in the Santa Catalina Mountains [14]) are found in the lower plate of the Maricopa thrust.

Within the peraluminous granitoid intrusive complexes, Stage 3 biotite granodiorite to Stage 3.5 two-mica granites are specifically associated with the peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits. Stage 4 garnet-muscovite aplo-granites and pegmatites are associated with slightly later tungsten and minor beryllium and fluorine occurrences. Coarse muscovite-iron oxide-quartz greisen is the main alteration type and is superimposed on quartz-orthoclase-magnetite/hematite veining.

Peraluminous magmatism in orogenic belts may occur during the culmination of both types of collisional orogenies: continent-continent collisions and the late flat subduction phases of continental-oceanic crust collisions. On a global basis, peraluminous copper-oxide greisen deposits are predicted to occur in thrust belts of both low-angle subduction of oceanic plates as well as continual plate collisions. Examples can be found in the Himalayan orogen and the anatectic granitoid belt of western North America. Exploration attention should focus on copper occurrences associated with peraluminous magmatism in Arizona and northern Mexico, in the Himalaya Mountains, possibly in the Hercynian orogen (Cornwall region), and possibly in Chile and western South America.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance and logistical support from MagmaChem Research Institute, Global Metals Inc., and Jan Rasmussen Consulting. Our insights and conclusions are the result of our extensive consulting experience, supported by previous clients, who are much appreciated. We also gratefully acknowledge drafting by Peg O’Malley.

References

  1. 1. Rasmussen J, Keith S. Arizona Mineral Districts V. 3 La Paz and Yuma Counties. Amazon: Kindle Direct Publishers; 2024. p. 465. Available from: https://www.amazon.com/Arizona-Mineral-Districts-Yuma-Counties/dp/B0CWXGQ9NW.
  2. 2. Durning W. Geology and Mineralization of Little Hill Mines Area, Northern Catalina Mountains, Pinal County, Arizona [M.S. thesis]. Tucson, University of Arizona; 1972. 91 p. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/566383.
  3. 3. Durning W, Davis J. The root-zone characteristics of porphyry copper deposits. In: Jenney J, Hauck H, editors. Proceedings of the Porphyry Copper Symposium. Tucson: Arizona Geological Society Digest; 1978 18-20 March 1976. p. 8190 v. 11.
  4. 4. Keith S, Rasmussen J. Peraluminous Copper-oxide Greisen Deposits: Arizona Geological Society Talk, 29 September 2025. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgaWq65UzL8.
  5. 5. Rasmussen J, Keith S. Arizona Mineral Districts V. 5 Pinal County. Kindle Direct Publishers, Amazon, 2025, in progress. >500 p. Available from: https://www.amazon.com/Arizona-Mineral-Districts-Pinal-County.
  6. 6. Keith S, Laux D, Maughan J, Schwab K, Ruff S, Swan M, Abbott E, Friberg S. Magma Series and metallogeny: A case study from Nevada and environs: Magma chemistry. In: Buffa R, Coyner A, editors. Geology and ore deposits of the Great Basin; field trip guidebook compendium. Reno, NV: Geologic Society of Nevada; 1991. p. 404493.
  7. 7. Keith S. Petrochemical variations in Laramide magmatism and their relationship to Laramide tectonic and metallogenic evolution in Arizona and adjacent regions. In: Beatty B, Wilkinson P, editors. Frontiers in Geology and Ore Deposits of Arizona and the Southwest. Vol. 16. Tucson: Arizona Geological Society Digest; 1986. p. 89101.
  8. 8. Keith S, Swan M. The great Laramide porphyry copper cluster of Arizona, Sonora, and New Mexico: Their tectonic setting, petrology, and genesis of a world class porphyry metal cluster. In: Coyner A, Fahey P, editors. Geology and Ore Deposits of the American Cordillera: Geological Society of Nevada, Symposium Proceedings. Nevada: Reno/Sparks. April. 1995 Volume III, 1996. p. 16671747.
  9. 9. Fitzpatrick W. Development of the Texas Canyon Granite Magmatic-hydrothermal System, Little Dragoon Mountains, Arizona [M.S. thesis]: Tucson: University of Arizona; 2021, 249 p. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/660211.
  10. 10. Stavast W. Three-dimensional Evolution of Magmatic Hydrothermal Systems, Schultze Granite and Ruby Star Granodiorite, Arizona [Ph.d. Dissertation]. Tucson: University of Arizona; 2006. 414 p. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/194841.
  11. 11. Keith S, Wilt J. Laramide orogeny in Arizona and adjacent regions: A strato-tectonic synthesis. In: Beatty B, Wilkinson P, editors. Frontiers in Geology and Ore Deposits of Arizona and the Southwest. 16. Tucson: Arizona Geological Society Digest, 1986, p. 502554.
  12. 12. Medhi P. A Geologic Study of the Pontatoc Mine Area, Pima County, Arizona [M.S. Thesis]. Tucson: University of Arizona; 1964. 56 p. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/553996.
  13. 13. Sherwonit W. A Petrographic Study of the Catalina Gneiss in the Forerange of the Catalina Mountains, Arizona [M.S. Thesis]. Tucson: University of Arizona; 1974. p. 165. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/566584.
  14. 14. Keith S, Rasmussen J. Wilderness granitic suite along Catalina Highway – Petrologic and tectonic significance of the Wilderness plutonic suite: Products from a massive water-flood event of hydrous crustal melting during high-speed flat subduction in the Latest Laramide. Tucson: Arizona Geological Society, Spring Field Trip. 2019;69.
  15. 15. Rasmussen J, Keith S. Arizona Mineral Districts V. 2 Pima County. Amazon: Kindle Direct Publishers; 2023. p. 362. Available from: https://www.amazon.com/Arizona-Mineral-Districts-Pima-County/dp/B0C9SBVP2S.
  16. 16. Zimmerman R, Bickel J, Dyer T, Prenn N, Bowell R, McNulty T, Barlet R. Gunnison Copper Project, NI 43-101 Technical Report, Gunnison Copper Project Prefeasibility Study Update and JCM Heap Leach Preliminary Economic Assessment, Cochise County, Arizona, USA. 3M NI-43-101 Report on SEDAR Prepared for Excelsior Mining Corp., 223. p. 448.
  17. 17. Yang H, Gu X, Gibbs R, Evans S, Down R, Jibrin Z. Lazaraskeite, Cu(C2H3O3)2, the first organic mineral containing glycolate, from the Santa Catalina Mountains, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A. American Mineralogist. 2022;107(3):509516. DOI: 10.2138/am-2021-7895.
  18. 18. Yang H, Gu X, Kampf A, Lazar W, Gibbs R, Downs R. Rasmussenite, Ca(C2H3O3)2.3H2O, Isomorphous with Ca-Glycinate Trihydrate, a New Glycolate Mineral from the Santa Catalina Mountains, Tucson, Arizona, USA. The Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology. 2025;63:385395. 2025. DOI: 10.2138/am-2025-7895. DOI: 10.3749/2500021.
  19. 19. Weitz T. Geology and Ore Deposition at the I-10 Prospect, Cochise County, Arizona [M.S. thesis]. Tucson: University of Arizona; 1976, 118 p. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/555081.
  20. 20. ADMMR (Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Resources) file data, accessed at Arizona Geological Survey, mining data website September 2025. Available from: https://mininginfo.azgs.arizona.edu/.
  21. 21. Spencer J, Isachsen C, Ferguson C, Richard S, Skotnicki S, Wooden J, Riggs N. U-Pb isotope geochronologic data from 23 igneous rock units in central and southeastern Arizona. Tucson: Arizona Geological Survey; Open-File Report OFR-03-08, 2003. 40 p. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/630033.
  22. 22. Spencer J, Richard S, Ferguson C. Compilation Geologic Map of the Oracle 7½’ Quadrangle, Pinal and Pima Counties, Arizona. Tucson: Arizona Geological Survey; Open-File Report OFR-00-05; 2000. 30 p. map. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/630713.
  23. 23. Johnson G. The Geology and Geochronology of the Northern Picacho Mountains, Pinal County, Arizona [M.S. Thesis]. Tucson: University of Arizona; 1981. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/557721.
  24. 24. Richard S, Spencer J, Ferguson C, Pearthree P. Geologic map of the Picacho Mountains and Picacho Peak, Pinal County, southern Arizona, v. 2.0. Tucson: Arizona Geological Survey, Digital Geologic Map 154, 2022. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/630820/.
  25. 25. Richard S, Youberg A, Spencer J, Ferguson C. Geologic map of the Durham Hills 7.5’quadrangle, Pinal County, Arizona. Tucson: Arizona Geological Survey, Digital Geologic Map 19. Version 2. 2021. Scale 1:24,000. Available from: https://arizona.aws.openrepository.com/handle/10150/630922.
  26. 26. Barter C. Geology of the Owl Head Mining District, Pinal County, Arizona [M.S. thesis]. Tucson: University of Arizona. 1962. 73 p. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/557721.
  27. 27. Spencer J, Richard S. Geologic map of the North Butte area, central Arizona. Tucson; Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report OFR-97-4. 1997. Scale 1:24,000. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/handle/10150/678563.
  28. 28. Nickerson P. Post-mineral Faulting in Arizona Porphyry Systems [Ph.D. dissertation]: Tucson. University of Arizona. 2012. 310 p. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/242354.
  29. 29. Skotnicki S. Geologic map of the Ninetysix Hills, Pinal County, Arizona. Tucson. Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report OFR-99-20, 1999. 14 p., scale 1:24,000. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/630612.
  30. 30. Bradfish LJ. Petrogenesis of the Tea Cup Granodiorite, Pinal County, Arizona [M.S. Thesis]: Tucson; University of Arizona. 1979, 2012. 60 p. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/566521.
  31. 31. Howard K, Foster D. Thermal and unroofing history of a thick, tilted Basin-and-Range crustal section in the Tortilla Mountains, Arizona. Journal of Geophysical Research. 1996;101(B1):511522. Available from: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/39095574/543325740cf22395f29e06fa-libre.pdf?1444523697.
  32. 32. Cornwall H, Krieger M. Geologic map of the Grayback quadrangle, Pinal County, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey. 1975. GQ-1206. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/gq/1206/report.pdf.
  33. 33. Balla J. The Relationship of Laramide Stocks to Regional Structure in Central Arizona [Ph.d. Dissertation]. Tucson: University of Arizona. 151 p. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/244075.
  34. 34. Skotnicki S, Ferguson C. Geologic Map of the Sacaton Mountains, Pinal County, Arizona. Tucson. Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report OFR-96-10, 1996. 1:24,000 Scale. Available from: https://arizona.aws.openrepository.com/handle/10150/630836.
  35. 35. Bergquist J, Blacet P. Preliminary reconnaissance bedrock geologic map of part of the Casa Grande Mountains quadrangle, Pinal County, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 78-547. 1978. Scale: 1:24,000. DOI: 10.3133/ofr78547.
  36. 36. Melchiorre E. Geology and mineral resources of the Sierra Estrella, Maricopa County, Arizona v.2: Tucson: Arizona Geological Survey Digital Geologic Map: DGM-195. 2024. scale 1:50,000. 22 p Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/675603.
  37. 37. Fitzgerald P, Reynolds S, Stump E, Foster D, Gleadow A. Thermochronologic evidence for timing of denudation and rate of crustal extension of the South Mountains metamorphic core complex and Sierra Estrella, Arizona. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements. 1993;21(4):555563. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/135901899390196G.
  38. 38. Richard S, Reynolds S, Spencer J, Pearthree P. Compilers. Geologic Map of Arizona. Tucson: Arizona Geological Survey Map M-35, scale 1:1,000,000. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10150/677692.
  39. 39. Grubensky M, Shipman T. Geologic map of the Vulture Mine 7.5’ quadrangle, Maricopa County, Arizona. Tucson: Arizona Geological Survey Digital Geologic Map. 2004;41:DGM–41. version 1.0. 2004 Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/630965.
  40. 40. Rehrig W, Shafiqullah M, Damon P. Geochronology, geology and listric normal faulting of the Vulture Mountains, Maricopa County, Arizona. In: Jenney J, Stone C, editors. Studies in Western Arizona. Tucson: Arizona Geological Society Digest; 1980. Vol. 12. p. 89110. Available from: https://cdn.wildapricot.com/72615/resources/Documents/Publications/Digests/Digest_12/.
  41. 41. Strickland E. Geology of the Footwall of the Northern Plomosa Mountains Metamorphic Core Complex, West-central Arizona [M.S. thesis]. Fort Collins: Colorado State University. 2017. 256 p. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/b531ff54d5952450d01dac26a7bab5d2/.
  42. 42. Strickland E, Singleton J, Griffin A, Seymour N. Geologic map of the Northern Plomosa Mountains metamorphic core complex, Arizona. Tucson: Arizona Geological Survey Contributed Map: 2017;CM-17-A, scale 1:10,000. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/handle/10150/630078.
  43. 43. MagmaChem Unpublished Data. Available from: https://magmachemri.org.
  44. 44. Fornash K, Patchett P, Gehrels G, Spencer J. Evolution of granitoids in the Catalina metamorphic core complex, southeastern Arizona: U–Pb, Nd, and Hf isotopic constraints. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology. 2013;165:12951310. Available from: https://www.geo.arizona.edu/tectonics/Ducea/tecpet/homework/fornash.pdf.
  45. 45. Ducea M, Triantafyllou A, Krcmaric J. New timing and depth constraints for the Catalina metamorphic core complex, southeast Arizona. Tectonics. 2020;39(8):115. DOI: 10.1029/2020TC006383.
  46. 46. Shakel D. The Geology of Layered Gneisses in Part of the Santa Catalina Forerange, Pima County, Arizona [M.S. Thesis]. Tucson: University of Arizona; 1974;1250. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/555044.
  47. 47. Terrien J. The Role of Magmatism in the Catalina Metamorphic Core Complex, Arizona: Insights from Integrated Thermochronology, Gravity and Aeromagnetic Data [Ph.D. dissertation]. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University. 2012;1245 p. Available from: https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=ear_etd.
  48. 48. Keith S, Reynolds S, Damon P, Shafiqullah M, Livingston D, Pushkar P. Evidence for multiple intrusion and deformation within the Santa Catalina-Rincon-Tortolita crystalline complex, southeastern Arizona. In: Crittenden Jr M, Coney P, Davis G, editors. Cordilleran Metamorphic Core Complexes. 153. Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society of America Memoir; 1980. p. 217267. DOI: 10.1130/MEM153-p217.
  49. 49. Cooper J, Silver L. Geology and ore deposits of the Dragoon quadrangle, Cochise County, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper. 1964;416:1196. DOI: 10.3133/pp416.
  50. 50. Chapman J, Dafov M, Gehrels G, Ducea M, Valley J, Ishida A. Lithospheric architecture and tectonic evolution of the southwestern US Cordillera: Constraints from zircon Hf and O isotopic data. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 2018;130:20312046. Available from: https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10085926. DOI: 10.1130/B31937.1.
  51. 51. Chapman J, Runyon S, Shields J, Lawler B, Pridmore C, Scoggin S, Swaim N, Trzinski A, Wiley H, Barth A, Haxel G. The North American Cordilleran anatectic belt. Earth-Science Reviews. 2021; 215: 103576. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103576.
  52. 52. Hardin J. Geological Analysis of Aplite Dikes, Texas Canyon Stock, Arizona [B.S. Thesis]. Tucson: University of Arizona. 2016:131. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/618765.
  53. 53. Arnold A 1986, Geologic Implications of a Geochemical Study of Three Two-mica Granites in Southern Arizona [M.S. Thesis]. Tucson: University of Arizona. 1986:1155. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/231236.
  54. 54. Woodson J, Bickel J, Sydykov A, McNulty T, Bartlett R, Richey J, Ryan T. Johnson Camp Mine, NI 43-101 Technical Report, Cochise County, Arizona, USA. Sedar. Technical Report for Gunnison Copper. 2025. 196 p.
  55. 55. Peterson N. Geology and ore deposits of the Globe-Miami district, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper. 1962; 342: 157. DOI: 10.3133/pp342.
  56. 56. MinDat.org. Available from: https://www.mindat.org.
  57. 57. Gatchalian F. Report on Azurite Mine Copper Prospect, Miami-Globe, Arizona, U.S.A. Tucson: Arizona Geological Survey, ADMMR Files, Private Consultant’s Report in ADMMR Azurite Mine File, 1975:121 Available from: https://mininginfo.azgs.arizona.edu/.
  58. 58. Grant R. Blue Ball Mine. Tucson: The Mineralogical Record. 1989;20(6):447.
  59. 59. Bird S, Lane R, Meintjes T, Norine J. NI 43-101 Preliminary economic assessment technical report for the Van Dyke copper project. Sedar. Moose Mountain Technical Services Report for Copper Fox Metals Inc. 26 February 2021:237 p. Available from: https://copperfoxmetals.com/projects/van-dyke/technical-reports/.
  60. 60. Ransome F 1919, The copper deposits of Ray and Miami, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey. Professional Paper 115. 1919:246 p. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/pp115.
  61. 61. Bryan R, Spiller D. Zonia Copper Project, Yavapai County, Arizona, USA. NI43-101 Technical Report Prepared for Cardero Resource Corp., October 2017. Available from: https://resourceworld.com/cardero-files-technical-report-on-zonia-copper-pea/ [Accessed: 2025-November-01].
  62. 62. World Copper Ltd.com. Available from: https://worldcopperltd.com/company/properties/zonia/.
  63. 63. Bird S NI 43-101 Resource Estimate for the Zonia Project 2024 Update; Report by Moose Mountain Technical Services Prepared for World Copper Ltd. 2024;111 p. Available from: https://minedocs.com/27/Zonia-TR-Amended-08272024.pdf.
  64. 64. Keith S, Wilt J. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic orogenesis of Arizona and adjacent regions: A strato-tectonic approach. Flores R, Kaplan S, editors. Cenozoic Paleogeography of West-central United States. Denver, Colorado: Rocky Mountain Section - Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists; 1985. p. 403437. Available from: https://www.janrasmussen.com/pdfs/Cenozoic.pdf. [Accessed: 2025-November-01].
  65. 65. Cooper J. Metamorphism and volume losses in carbonate rocks near Johnson Camp, Cochise County, Arizona. Geological Society of America. 1957v; 68: 577610. doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1957)68[577:MAVLIC]2.0.CO;2.
  66. 66. Bickel J, Gustin M, Dyer T, Bowel R. Estimated Mineral Resources and Preliminary Economic Analysis, Strong and Harris Copper-zinc-silver Project, Cochise County, Arizona. NI 43-101 Report by Mine Development Associates, Submitted to Excelsior Mining Corp. 9 September 2021. 159 p. Available from: https://www.gunnisoncopper.com/images/pdf/Reports/2024/M3-PN210313.005-_Gunnison_Project_Open_Pit_PEA_NI_43-101_Rev_0.pdf.
  67. 67. Greig R. Superposed Magmatic and Hydrothermal Systems, and the Evolution of the Laramide Arc and Porphyry Copper Province, Southwestern North America [Ph.D. dissertation]. 2021, Tucson: University of Arizona; 2021:346 p. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/660104.
  68. 68. Keith S. Unpublished Compilation of Microfilm Production Information from Arizona Mineral Districts, Based on U.S. Bureau of Mines Files (1981) and Pre-1905 Production Data from the Literature. unpublished computer printouts from Dec 10 punch data cards, 1980. 13 county volumes.
  69. 69. Briggs D. Arizona copper production. Arizona Geological Survey. Contributed Report Excel Files. in press.
  70. 70. Website: Available from: www.miningdataonline.com.
  71. 71. Gunnison Copper Website. Available from: https://gunnisoncopper.com [Accessed: 2025-November-01].
  72. 72. Leveille R, Stegen R. The southwestern North America porphyry copper province [Chapter 15]. In Hedenquist J, Harris M, Camus F. 2012, Geology and Genesis of Major Copper Deposits and Districts of the World: A Tribute to Richard H. Sillitoe. Society of Economic Geologists. Special Publication 16. Littleton, Colorado, USA: Society of Economic Geologists; 2012. p. 361401. DOI: 10.5382/SP.16 [Accessed: 2025-November-14].
  73. 73. Coney P. Cordilleran metamorphic core complexes: An overview. In: Crittenden Jr. M, Coney P, Davis G. editors. Cordilleran Metamorphic Core Complexes. Geological Society of America. Memoir. 1980, Vol. 152 Boulder, Colorado, USA: Geological Society of America. 1980. 37. DOI: 10.1130/MEM153-p7.
  74. 74. Keith S, Wilt J. Decretion: Laramide Cordilleran tectonics in the Tucson region. Arizona Geological Society, 1983 Spring Field Trip, 16-17April1983. 159 p.
  75. 75. Spencer J, Singleton J, Strickland E, Reynolds S, Love D, Foster D, Johnson R. Geodynamics of Cenozoic extension along a transect across the Colorado River extensional corridor, southwestern USA. Geological Society of America Lithosphere. 2018;6:743759. Available from: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4464-6332.
  76. 76. Reif D, Robinson J. Geophysical, geochemical, and petrographic data and regional correlation from the Arizona State A-1 well, Pinal County, Arizona. In: Stone C, Jenney J. editors. Arizona Geological Society Digest. Vol 13. Tucson, Arizona, USA; 1981. p. 99109. Available from: https://www.arizonageologicalsoc.org/page-1855748.
  77. 77. Vikre P, Graybeal F, Koutz F. Concealed basalt-matrix diatremes with Cu-Au-Ag-(Mo)-mineralized xenoliths, Santa Cruz Porphyry Cu-(Mo) system, Pinal County, Arizona. Economic Geology. 2014; 109: 12711289. Available from: https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/segweb/economicgeology/article-abstract/109/5/1271/128643.
  78. 78. Stegen R. Field Trip Organizer. Porphyry Copper Deposits in the Casa Grande Area, Pinal County, Arizona. Arizona Geological Society. Fall Field Trip 26 October 2024, 37 p. Available from: https://cdn.wildapricot.com/72615/resources/Documents/Publications/Field_Trip_Guidebooks/AGS_Fall%202024_Casa%20Grande/.
  79. 79. Daniel Laux. personal communication. Apache Junction, Arizona. 2025.
  80. 80. Hauser E, Gephart J, Latham T, Oliver J, Kaufman S, Brown L, Lucchitta I. COCORP Arizona transect: Strong crustal reflections and offset Moho beneath the transition zone. Geology. 1987;15(12):11031106. DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1987)15<1103:CATSCR>2.0.CO;2.
  81. 81. Gottardi R, McAlee R, Casal G, Borel M, Iriondo A, Jepson G. Exhumation of the Coyote Mountains metamorphic core complex (Arizona): Implications for orogenic collapse of the southern North American Cordillera. Tectonics. 2020;39:e2019TC006050. DOI: 10.1029/2019TC006050.
  82. 82. Kapp P, Jepson G, Carrapa B, Schaen A, He J, Wang J. Laramide bulldozing of lithosphere beneath the Arizona transition zone, southwestern United States. Geology. 2023;51(10):952956. DOI: 10.1130/G51194.1.
  83. 83. Anderson J, Barth A, Young E. Mid-crustal Cretaceous roots of Cordilleran metamorphic core complexes. Geology. 1988;16:366369. Available from: https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/segweb/economicgeology/article-abstract/109/5/1271/128643/. or Available from: https://www.muststayawake.com/SDAG/library/Anderson1988.pdf.
  84. 84. Force E. Geology and Mineral Resources of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Southeastern Arizona. Tucson: Arizona; Center for Mineral Resources. Monographs in Mineral Resource Science. 1997. 1. p. 134. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/641989?show=full.
  85. 85. Isaachson C, Gehrels G, Riggs N, Spencer J, Ferguson C, Skotnicki S, Richard S. U-Pb geochronologic data from zircons from eleven granitic rocks in central and western Arizona. Tucson: Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report. OFR-99-05. 1999;27. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10150/630032.
  86. 86. Scoggin S, Chapman J, Shields J, Trzinski A, Ducea M. Early paleogene magmatism in the Pinaleño Mountains, Arizona: Evidence for crustal melting of diverse basement assemblages during the laramide orogeny. Journal of Petrology. 2021;62(12):119. Available from: https://www.jaychapman.org/uploads/5/1/1/2/51121813/scoggin_etal_2021.pdf.
  87. 87. Theodore T, Blair W, Nash J, McKee E. Geology and gold mineralization of the Gold Basin-Lost Basin mining districts, Mohave County, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1361. 1987; 167 p. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/pp1361.
  88. 88. Burnham C. Magma and hydrothermal fluids. In: Barnes H, editor. Geochemistry of Hydrothermal Ore Deposits. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley Interscience; 1979. p. 71136.
  89. 89. Sillitoe R. Copper provinces [Chapter 1]. In: Hedenquist J, Harris M, Camus F. editors. Geology and Genesis of Major Copper Deposits and Districts of the World: A Tribute to Richard H. Sillitoe. Society of Economic Geologists. Special Publication 16. Littleton, Colorado, USA; 2012, p. 115. DOI: 10.5382/SP.16.
  90. 90. Naney M. Phase equilibria of rock-forming ferromagnesian silicates in granitic systems. American Journal of Science. 1983;283:9981033. DOI: 10.2475/ajs.283.10.993.
  91. 91. Mizer J. Early Laramide Magmatism in Southern Arizona: U-Pb Geochronology of Key Igneous Units and Implications for the Timing of Regional Porphyry Copper Mineralization. [Ph.D. dissertation]. Tucson: University of Arizona. 2018. 622 p. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/630212.
  92. 92. Seedorf E, Barton M, Gehrels G, Valencia V, Johnson D, Maher D, Stavast W, Marsh T. Temporal evolution of the Laramide arc: U-Pb geochronology of plutons associated with porphyry copper mineralization in east-central Arizona. In: Pearthree P, editor. Geologic Excursions in Southwestern North America. Geological Society of America. Field Guide 55. Boulder, Colorado, USA; 2019, p. 369400. DOI:10.1130/2019.0055(15).
  93. 93. Koski R, Cook D. Geology of the Christmas porphyry copper deposit. In: Titley S, editor. Advances in Geology of the Porphyry Copper Deposits, Southwestern North America. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 1982. p. 354374.
  94. 94. Rasmussen J, Keith S. Arizona Mineral Districts V. 1 Cochise and Santa Cruz Counties. Amazon: Kindle Direct Publishers; 2023. p. 299. Available from: https://www.amazon.com/Arizona-Mineral-Districts-Cochise-Counties/dp/B0BZB5P8TL.
  95. 95. Coney P, Reynolds S. Cordilleran Benioff zones. Nature. 1977;270:403406. DOI: 10.1038/270403a0.
  96. 96. Keith S. Paleosubduction geometries inferred from Cretaceous and Tertiary magmatic patterns in southwestern North America. Geology (Boulder). 1978;6(9):516521. DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1978)6<516:PGIFCA>2.0.CO;2/.
  97. 97. Keith S. Paleoconvergence rates determined from K2O/SiO2 ratios in magmatic rocks and their application to Cretaceous and Tertiary tectonic patterns in southwestern North America. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 1981;93(6):524532. DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1978)6<516:PGIFCA>2.0.CO;2.
  98. 98. Helmstaedt H, Schulze D. Early to mid-Tertiary inverted metamorphic gradient under the Colorado Plateau: Evidence from eclogite xenoliths in ultramafic microbreccias, Navajo Volcanic Field. Journal of Geophysical Research. 1991;96(B8):13,225-13,235. DOI: 10.1029/91JB00284. or Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Herwart-Helmstaedt/publication/248793359.
  99. 99. Allenby R, Schnetzler C. 1983. United States crustal thickness. Tectonophysics. 94(1-2):1331. DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(83)90231-7.
  100. 100. Shehata M, Mizunaga H. Moho depth and tectonic implications of the western United States: Insights from gravity data interpretation. Geoscience Letters, 2022;9(23):15. DOI: 10.1186/s40562-022-00233-y.
  101. 101. Miller C, Bradfish L. An inner Cordilleran belt of muscovite-bearing plutons. Geology. 1980;8:412416. DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1980)8<412:AICBOM>2.0.CO;2.
  102. 102. Coney P. Overview of Mesozoic-Cenozoic Cordilleran plate tectonics. In: Smith R, editor. Cenozoic Tectonics and Regional Geophysics of the Western Cordillera. Geological Society of America Memoir 152, Vol. 152. Boulder, Colorado, USA: 1978. p. 13751392. DOI: 10.1130/MEM152-p33.
  103. 103. Solomon S, Sleep N, Richardson R. On the forces driving plate tectonics: Inferences from absolute plate velocities and intraplate stress. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 1975;42: 769801. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/42/2/769/652631.
  104. 104. Jurdy D. An alternative model for early Tertiary absolute plate motions. Geology. 1978;6(8):469472. DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1978)6<469:AAMFET>2.0.CO;2.
  105. 105. Chapin C, Cather S. Eocene tectonics and sedimentation in the Colorado Plateau-Rocky Mountain area. In: Dickinson W, Payne W. editors. Relations of Tectonics to Ore Deposits in the Southern Cordillera. Arizona Geol. Soc. Digest. 1981; Vol. 14. Tucson, Arizona, USA: p. 173198. Available from: https://www.arizonageologicalsoc.org/page-1855749.
  106. 106. Keith S, Livaccari R. Cordilleran decretion (abstract). Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. 1985;17(6):365.
  107. 107. Keith S, Livaccari R. Laramide-age decretion as a cause for mid-Tertiary Cordilleran magmatism and deformation (abstract). Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. 1990;22(3):34.
  108. 108. Keith S. Laramide and metallogenetic evolution within the porphyry copper cluster of the southwest (abstract). In: Dickinson W, Payne W. Relations of Tectonics to Ore Deposits in the Southern Cordillera. Arizona Geological Society Digest. Tucson, Arizona, USA: 1981, 14. p. 287. [Accessed: 2025-October-15] .
  109. 109. Dickinson W, Hatherton T. Andesitic volcanism and seismicity around the Pacific. Science. 1967;157:801803. DOI: 10.1126/science.157.3790.801.
  110. 110. Dickinson W. Potash-depth (K-h) relations in continental margin and intra-oceanic magmatic arcs. Geology. 1975; 23: 5356. DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1975)3<53:PKRICM>2.0.CO;2.
  111. 111. Keith S. Origins of Arizona copper deposits: Hypotheses. Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology Fieldnotes. 1978;8(1–2):9.
  112. 112. Runyon S. Deep Hydrothermal Alteration in Porphyry Copper Systems: Insights from the Laramide Arc [Ph.d. Dissertation]. Tucson: University of Arizona. 2017, 2017: 625 p. Available from: https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/625856.

Written By

Stanley B. Keith, Jan C. Rasmussen, Volker Spieth

Submitted: 22 November 2025 Reviewed: 27 November 2025 Published: 03 March 2026